From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ali Ahmet Memis" <ali@iusegentoo.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: elx: efct: check the HW state before allocating an HIO
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 20:59:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806205958.5566D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806202205.345326-2-ali@iusegentoo.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Pre-existing resource leak of `hio` (Hardware I/O object) in `efct_hw_bls_send()` when WQE formatting fails.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: elx: efct: check the HW state before allocating an HIO ---
commit dc19c507aa2788a2b5120f2a9e8e09430d14b440
Author: Ali Ahmet Memis <ali@iusegentoo.com>
scsi: elx: efct: check the HW state before allocating an HIO
efct_els_hw_srrs_send() takes an HIO from the pool and only then looks at
hw->state, returning without giving it back when the HW is not active. This
commit fixes the issue by moving the state check before allocating the HIO.
> Check the state first, the way efct_hw_bls_send() already does.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while efct_hw_bls_send() correctly checks
the state first, does it still have a resource leak when WQE formatting fails?
In efct_hw_bls_send(), an HIO is allocated via efct_hw_io_alloc(). If the
subsequent call to sli_xmit_bls_rsp64_wqe() fails, it returns -EIO directly
without releasing hio back to the free list:
drivers/scsi/elx/efct/efct_hw.c:efct_hw_bls_send() {
...
hio = efct_hw_io_alloc(hw);
...
if (sli_xmit_bls_rsp64_wqe(&hw->sli, hio->wqe.wqebuf,
&bls, bls_params)) {
efc_log_err(hw->os, "XMIT_BLS_RSP64 WQE error\n");
return -EIO;
}
...
}
Should this call efct_hw_io_free(hw, hio) before returning -EIO? Once the
pool is exhausted, efct_hw_io_alloc() will permanently fail.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806192345.328621-1-ali@iusegentoo.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 19:23 [PATCH 0/5] scsi: elx: efct: fix resources stranded on failure paths Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 19:23 ` [PATCH 1/5] scsi: elx: efct: check the HW state before allocating an HIO Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 19:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 19:23 ` [PATCH 2/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the HIO when the WQE cannot be built Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 19:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 19:23 ` [PATCH 3/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the request tag when the send frame WQE fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 19:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 19:23 ` [PATCH 4/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the RQ buffers already allocated when one fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 19:23 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi: elx: efct: destroy the mailbox pools when setup fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 19:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] scsi: elx: efct: fix resources stranded on failure paths Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: elx: efct: check the HW state before allocating an HIO Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:59 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the HIO when the WQE cannot be built Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the request tag when the send frame WQE fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the RQ buffers already allocated when one fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] scsi: elx: efct: destroy the mailbox pools when setup fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:57 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260806205958.5566D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ali@iusegentoo.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox