Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ali Ahmet Memis" <ali@iusegentoo.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: elx: efct: check the HW state before allocating an HIO
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 20:59:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260806205958.5566D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806202205.345326-2-ali@iusegentoo.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Pre-existing resource leak of `hio` (Hardware I/O object) in `efct_hw_bls_send()` when WQE formatting fails.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: elx: efct: check the HW state before allocating an HIO ---
commit dc19c507aa2788a2b5120f2a9e8e09430d14b440
Author: Ali Ahmet Memis <ali@iusegentoo.com>

scsi: elx: efct: check the HW state before allocating an HIO

efct_els_hw_srrs_send() takes an HIO from the pool and only then looks at
hw->state, returning without giving it back when the HW is not active. This
commit fixes the issue by moving the state check before allocating the HIO.

> Check the state first, the way efct_hw_bls_send() already does.

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while efct_hw_bls_send() correctly checks
the state first, does it still have a resource leak when WQE formatting fails?

In efct_hw_bls_send(), an HIO is allocated via efct_hw_io_alloc(). If the
subsequent call to sli_xmit_bls_rsp64_wqe() fails, it returns -EIO directly
without releasing hio back to the free list:

drivers/scsi/elx/efct/efct_hw.c:efct_hw_bls_send() {
...
	hio = efct_hw_io_alloc(hw);
...
	if (sli_xmit_bls_rsp64_wqe(&hw->sli, hio->wqe.wqebuf,
				   &bls, bls_params)) {
		efc_log_err(hw->os, "XMIT_BLS_RSP64 WQE error\n");
		return -EIO;
	}
...
}

Should this call efct_hw_io_free(hw, hio) before returning -EIO? Once the
pool is exhausted, efct_hw_io_alloc() will permanently fail.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260806192345.328621-1-ali@iusegentoo.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-06 20:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-06 19:23 [PATCH 0/5] scsi: elx: efct: fix resources stranded on failure paths Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 19:23 ` [PATCH 1/5] scsi: elx: efct: check the HW state before allocating an HIO Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 19:44   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 19:23 ` [PATCH 2/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the HIO when the WQE cannot be built Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 19:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 19:23 ` [PATCH 3/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the request tag when the send frame WQE fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 19:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 19:23 ` [PATCH 4/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the RQ buffers already allocated when one fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 19:23 ` [PATCH 5/5] scsi: elx: efct: destroy the mailbox pools when setup fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 19:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] scsi: elx: efct: fix resources stranded on failure paths Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] scsi: elx: efct: check the HW state before allocating an HIO Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:59   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the HIO when the WQE cannot be built Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the request tag when the send frame WQE fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:41   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] scsi: elx: efct: free the RQ buffers already allocated when one fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 20:22 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] scsi: elx: efct: destroy the mailbox pools when setup fails Ali Ahmet Memis
2026-08-06 20:57   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260806205958.5566D1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=ali@iusegentoo.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox