Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ye Bin" <yebin@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 1/2] scsi: iscsi: fix NULL pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn()
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 09:47:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821094757.45F171F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821092435.1632931-2-yebin@huaweicloud.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The patch introduces an endpoint (`struct iscsi_endpoint`) reference leak by unconditionally clearing `ISCSI_CLS_CONN_BIT_CLEANUP` in `iscsi_if_stop_conn()` during a `STOP_CONN_TERM`, causing the subsequent endpoint disconnect to incorrectly skip releasing the workqueue's reference.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH -next 1/2] scsi: iscsi: fix NULL pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn() ---
commit 15cab28507a9da46dab7d098d970770bae480083
Author: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>

scsi: iscsi: fix NULL pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn()

This commit addresses a NULL pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn()
by ensuring the ISCSI_CLS_CONN_BIT_CLEANUP bit is set during STOP_CONN_TERM.
This prevents concurrent execution of iscsi_stop_conn().

> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
> index 8aa76f813bcdb..aea319c1e72fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
> @@ -2278,35 +2280,36 @@ static int iscsi_if_stop_conn(struct iscsi_cls_conn *conn, int flag)

[ ... ]

> -		/*
> -		 * Only clear for recovery to avoid extra cleanup runs during
> -		 * termination.
> -		 */
> -		spin_lock_irq(&conn->lock);
> -		clear_bit(ISCSI_CLS_CONN_BIT_CLEANUP, &conn->flags);
> -		spin_unlock_irq(&conn->lock);
> -	}
> +	} else {
> +		iscsi_stop_conn(conn, flag);
> +	}
> +
> +	spin_lock_irq(&conn->lock);
> +	clear_bit(ISCSI_CLS_CONN_BIT_CLEANUP, &conn->flags);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&conn->lock);

[Severity: High]
Does this unconditionally clear ISCSI_CLS_CONN_BIT_CLEANUP during
STOP_CONN_TERM?

The original code avoided clearing this bit during termination, as the removed
comment explicitly noted.

If a connection error queues iscsi_cleanup_conn_work_fn(), which unbinds the
endpoint (setting conn->ep = NULL), and then userspace initiates termination
via iscsi_if_stop_conn(conn, STOP_CONN_TERM), iscsi_if_disconnect_bound_ep()
won't be called here because conn->ep is NULL.

When this bit is subsequently cleared unconditionally, and userspace later issues
an event to disconnect the endpoint, will iscsi_if_disconnect_bound_ep() skip
releasing the workqueue's reference?

drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c:iscsi_if_disconnect_bound_ep() {
    ...
	if (!test_bit(ISCSI_CLS_CONN_BIT_CLEANUP, &conn->flags)) {
		spin_unlock_irq(&conn->lock);
		iscsi_ep_disconnect(conn, is_active);
	} else {
		...
		iscsi_put_endpoint(ep);
    ...
}

Could this cause a resource leak of struct iscsi_endpoint over time?

> +
>  	ISCSI_DBG_TRANS_CONN(conn, "iscsi if conn stop done.\n");
>  	return 0;
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260821092435.1632931-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-21  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-21  9:24 [PATCH -next 0/2] scsi: iscsi: Fix races in connection cleanup path Ye Bin
2026-08-21  9:24 ` [PATCH -next 1/2] scsi: iscsi: fix NULL pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn() Ye Bin
2026-08-21  9:47   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-21  9:24 ` [PATCH -next 2/2] scsi: iscsi: Fix use-after-free in iscsi_conn_release() for cleanup_work Ye Bin
2026-08-21  9:49   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260821094757.45F171F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=yebin@huaweicloud.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox