From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ye Bin" <yebin@huaweicloud.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/2] scsi: iscsi: Fix use-after-free in iscsi_conn_release() for cleanup_work
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 09:49:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821094958.5FDAE1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821092435.1632931-3-yebin@huaweicloud.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Adding `cancel_work_sync(&conn->cleanup_work)` inside `iscsi_conn_release()` introduces a guaranteed AB-BA deadlock with `session->eh_mutex` when the final connection reference is dropped by the SCSI error handler.
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] ep->conn is never cleared when a connection is destroyed, leading to a Use-After-Free in iscsi_if_ep_disconnect().
- [High] LLD-specific background tasks (e.g., `transport_timer`, `xmitwork`) are not canceled before `iscsi_conn_release()` frees the connection memory, leading to a Use-After-Free.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH -next 2/2] scsi: iscsi: Fix use-after-free in iscsi_conn_release() for cleanup_work ---
commit 16664476ef28f32b2b58204098a289184054f45c
Author: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
scsi: iscsi: Fix use-after-free in iscsi_conn_release() for cleanup_work
This patch attempts to resolve a use-after-free by canceling the pending or
running cleanup_work task before freeing the connection memory in
iscsi_conn_release().
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
> index aea319c1e72fe..cdc337b0fc26a 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c
> @@ -2128,6 +2128,13 @@ static void iscsi_conn_release(struct device *dev)
> struct device *parent = conn->dev.parent;
>
> ISCSI_DBG_TRANS_CONN(conn, "Releasing conn\n");
> + /*
> + * iscsi_conn_error_event() may have queued conn->cleanup_work without
> + * holding a reference to the connection. Cancel any pending or
> + * running work before freeing the connection to prevent a
> + * use-after-free.
> + */
> + cancel_work_sync(&conn->cleanup_work);
[Severity: High]
Could this cancel_work_sync() introduce an AB-BA deadlock with
session->eh_mutex?
If a concurrent session teardown drops the main connection references, the
SCSI error handler might drop the final reference while still holding the
eh_mutex:
drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c:iscsi_eh_abort() {
mutex_lock(&session->eh_mutex);
...
iscsi_put_conn(conn->cls_conn);
mutex_unlock(&session->eh_mutex);
}
When iscsi_put_conn() triggers iscsi_conn_release(), it will block here
waiting for the workqueue to finish. However, if the worker thread is
already running, it attempts to acquire the exact same mutex:
drivers/scsi/libiscsi.c:iscsi_conn_stop() {
mutex_lock(&session->eh_mutex);
...
}
Would this cause the error handler and the workqueue to wait on each other
indefinitely?
> + kfree(conn);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does freeing the connection here without
canceling LLD-specific background tasks leave a use-after-free risk?
When a session is abruptly torn down, the teardown iterates over active
connections and drops the final reference:
drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c:iscsi_iter_destroy_conn_fn() {
...
iscsi_remove_conn(iscsi_dev_to_conn(dev));
iscsi_put_conn(iscsi_dev_to_conn(dev));
}
Because this bypasses the transport's destroy_conn callback (such as
iscsi_conn_teardown), asynchronous tasks like conn->transport_timer and
conn->xmitwork are never canceled.
Could this regression allow these timers or work tasks to execute later and
dereference the freed connection memory?
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is there another use-after-free possible
when an endpoint disconnects after a connection is destroyed?
If a session is forcefully destroyed via iscsi_remove_session(), the
connection is freed in iscsi_conn_release() as seen above. However,
ep->conn does not appear to be cleared when this happens.
If userspace then issues an ISCSI_UEVENT_TRANSPORT_EP_DISCONNECT command,
the kernel reads the dangling ep->conn pointer:
drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c:iscsi_if_ep_disconnect() {
conn = ep->conn;
if (!conn) {
...
}
mutex_lock(&conn->ep_mutex);
}
Could this regression allow a userspace netlink command to trigger a
use-after-free by acquiring the mutex on the freed connection memory?
> put_device(parent);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260821092435.1632931-1-yebin@huaweicloud.com?part=2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 9:24 [PATCH -next 0/2] scsi: iscsi: Fix races in connection cleanup path Ye Bin
2026-08-21 9:24 ` [PATCH -next 1/2] scsi: iscsi: fix NULL pointer dereference in iscsi_sw_tcp_release_conn() Ye Bin
2026-08-21 9:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 9:24 ` [PATCH -next 2/2] scsi: iscsi: Fix use-after-free in iscsi_conn_release() for cleanup_work Ye Bin
2026-08-21 9:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260821094958.5FDAE1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yebin@huaweicloud.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox