* [PATCH] scsi: pmcraid: Replace cpu_to_be64 + le64_to_cpu with swab64
@ 2025-12-10 14:33 Thorsten Blum
2025-12-10 15:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Blum @ 2025-12-10 14:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen
Cc: Thorsten Blum, linux-scsi, linux-kernel
Replace cpu_to_be64(le64_to_cpu()) with swab64() to simplify
pmcraid_prepare_cancel_cmd().
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
---
drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c b/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c
index 33f403e307eb..68c2a10453fe 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c
@@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ static void pmcraid_prepare_cancel_cmd(
* cdb[2]..cdb[9] is Big-Endian format. Note that length bits in
* IOARCB address are not masked.
*/
- ioarcb_addr = cpu_to_be64(le64_to_cpu(cmd_to_cancel->ioa_cb->ioarcb.ioarcb_bus_addr));
+ ioarcb_addr = swab64(cmd_to_cancel->ioa_cb->ioarcb.ioarcb_bus_addr);
/* Get the resource handle to where the command to be aborted has been
* sent.
--
Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev>
GPG: 1D60 735E 8AEF 3BE4 73B6 9D84 7336 78FD 8DFE EAD4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] scsi: pmcraid: Replace cpu_to_be64 + le64_to_cpu with swab64
2025-12-10 14:33 [PATCH] scsi: pmcraid: Replace cpu_to_be64 + le64_to_cpu with swab64 Thorsten Blum
@ 2025-12-10 15:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 15:39 ` Thorsten Blum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2025-12-10 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thorsten Blum
Cc: James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen, linux-scsi,
linux-kernel
On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 03:33:21PM +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> Replace cpu_to_be64(le64_to_cpu()) with swab64() to simplify
> pmcraid_prepare_cancel_cmd().
How does this not break the __le64/__be64 annotation checking?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] scsi: pmcraid: Replace cpu_to_be64 + le64_to_cpu with swab64
2025-12-10 15:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2025-12-10 15:39 ` Thorsten Blum
2025-12-10 22:21 ` David Laight
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Blum @ 2025-12-10 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig
Cc: James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen, linux-scsi,
linux-kernel
On 10. Dec 2025, at 16:13, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 03:33:21PM +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote:
>> Replace cpu_to_be64(le64_to_cpu()) with swab64() to simplify
>> pmcraid_prepare_cancel_cmd().
>
> How does this not break the __le64/__be64 annotation checking?
I'm not sure and didn't investigate, but it compiles without warnings.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] scsi: pmcraid: Replace cpu_to_be64 + le64_to_cpu with swab64
2025-12-10 15:39 ` Thorsten Blum
@ 2025-12-10 22:21 ` David Laight
2025-12-10 22:45 ` Thorsten Blum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Laight @ 2025-12-10 22:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thorsten Blum
Cc: Christoph Hellwig, James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen,
linux-scsi, linux-kernel
On Wed, 10 Dec 2025 16:39:36 +0100
Thorsten Blum <thorsten.blum@linux.dev> wrote:
> On 10. Dec 2025, at 16:13, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 10, 2025 at 03:33:21PM +0100, Thorsten Blum wrote:
> >> Replace cpu_to_be64(le64_to_cpu()) with swab64() to simplify
> >> pmcraid_prepare_cancel_cmd().
> >
> > How does this not break the __le64/__be64 annotation checking?
>
> I'm not sure and didn't investigate, but it compiles without warnings.
>
>
You'd need to run sparse.
David
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] scsi: pmcraid: Replace cpu_to_be64 + le64_to_cpu with swab64
2025-12-10 22:21 ` David Laight
@ 2025-12-10 22:45 ` Thorsten Blum
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thorsten Blum @ 2025-12-10 22:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Laight
Cc: Christoph Hellwig, James E.J. Bottomley, Martin K. Petersen,
linux-scsi, linux-kernel
On 10. Dec 2025, at 23:21, David Laight wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> You'd need to run sparse.
I compiled it with C=1 and there are other, unrelated sparse warnings:
CC [M] drivers/scsi/pmcraid.o
CHECK drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c
drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c:73:1: error: bad constant expression
drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c:74:1: error: bad constant expression
drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c:75:1: error: bad constant expression
drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c:76:1: error: bad constant expression
drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c:78:1: error: bad constant expression
drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c:79:1: error: bad constant expression
drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c:84:1: error: bad constant expression
drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c:85:1: error: bad constant expression
drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c:89:1: error: bad constant expression
drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c:90:1: error: bad constant expression
Compiling with V=1 also confirms that sparse is running:
# CHECK drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c
sparse -D__linux__ ... -D__KBUILD_MODNAME=pmcraid drivers/scsi/pmcraid.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-12-10 22:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-12-10 14:33 [PATCH] scsi: pmcraid: Replace cpu_to_be64 + le64_to_cpu with swab64 Thorsten Blum
2025-12-10 15:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-12-10 15:39 ` Thorsten Blum
2025-12-10 22:21 ` David Laight
2025-12-10 22:45 ` Thorsten Blum
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox