From: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
To: James Smart <James.Smart@Emulex.Com>
Cc: "jeykholt@cisco.com" <jeykholt@cisco.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"jre@nuovasystems.com" <jre@nuovasystems.com>,
"ajoglekar@nuovasystems.com" <ajoglekar@nuovasystems.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/6] fnic: add fnic_scsi.c and fnic_io.h.
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:31:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48B30885.1010808@cs.wisc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48B304BD.9060404@emulex.com>
James Smart wrote:
>
>
> Mike Christie wrote:
>> jeykholt@cisco.com wrote:
>>> fnic: add fnic_scsi.c and fnic_io.h.
>>>
>>> fnic_scsi.c contains the FCP SCSI handling as well as firmware reset
>>> and FLOGI registration handling.
>>>
>>
>> I just looked at this one function, because I was fixing the same code
>> in fcoe.ko/libfc:fc_fcp.c
>>
>>
>>> +int fnic_reset(struct Scsi_Host *shost)
>>> +{
>>> + struct fc_lport *lp;
>>> + struct fnic *fnic;
>>> + unsigned long flags;
>>> + int ret = SUCCESS;
>>> + enum fnic_state old_state;
>>> + DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(reset_wait);
>>> +
>>> + lp = shost_priv(shost);
>>> + fnic = lp->drv_priv;
>>> +
>>> + printk(KERN_DEBUG DFX "fnic_reset called\n", fnic->fnic_no);
>>> +
>>> + /* Issue firmware reset */
>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
>>> + fnic->reset_wait = &reset_wait;
>>> + old_state = fnic->state;
>>> + fnic->state = FNIC_IN_FC_TRANS_ETH_MODE;
>>> + vnic_dev_del_addr(fnic->vdev, fnic->data_src_addr);
>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
>>> +
>>> + if (fnic_fw_reset_handler(fnic)) {
>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
>>> + ret = FAILED;
>>> + if (fnic->state == FNIC_IN_FC_TRANS_ETH_MODE)
>>> + fnic->state = old_state;
>>> + fnic->reset_wait = NULL;
>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
>>> + goto fnic_reset_end;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + /* fw reset is issued, now wait for it to complete */
>>> + wait_for_completion_timeout(&reset_wait,
>>> +
>>> msecs_to_jiffies(FNIC_HOST_RESET_TIMEOUT));
>>> +
>>> + /* Check for status */
>>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
>>> + fnic->reset_wait = NULL;
>>> + ret = (fnic->state == FNIC_IN_ETH_MODE) ? SUCCESS : FAILED;
>>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fnic->fnic_lock, flags);
>>> +
>>> + /* Now reset local port, this will clean up libFC exchanges,
>>> + * reset remote port sessions, and if link is up, begin flogi
>>> + */
>>> + fc_lport_lock(lp);
>>> + if (lp->tt.lport_reset(lp))
>>> + ret = FAILED;
>>
>>
>> The problem here is that this only starts the login. When fnic_reset
>> returns for the scsi eh path, scsi-ml is going to send a TUR to make
>> sure that we are ready to go. If we are not the devices will be
>> offlined. So unless it is a really quick relogin we are going to offline
>> the devices by accident.
>
> Well - what should be happening is - prior to the reset or as part of
> it, the fc transport fc_remote_port_delete() call should be made on all
> those remote ports that connectivity is about to be terminated on. This
> will place all the associated targets/luns on those rports into a
> blocked state, and start the devloss timer on them. This will suspend
> the eh path as well. Thus, things suspend until either the driver/fcoe
What do you mean by that? For lpfc it will or for this driver? This
driver does not have that block call like lpfc_block_error_handler, so
if the rport event occurs after the scsi eh is running we do not suspend
the eh.
So below I am saying we should make the lpfc_block_error_handler
functionality and the equivalent in the qla2xxx and mpfc common so
libfc/fcoe and fnic can use it.
> stack re-login's and re-calls the transport with the same remote port
> (thus the transport will unblock the targets/luns), or devloss_tmo
> expires, at which time it is correct to report loss of connectivity.
>
> Of course, all this assumes the fc_host stays in existence.
>
>>
>> For fc_fcp.c I added a hokey loop and wait like some other drivers. We
>> could instead have libfc notify any waiters of a state change here. We
>> could also do a rport blocked timedout helper, convert the fc drivers
>> and use it here so we only wait for the login to complete or for the
>> port block to fail.
>
> -- james s
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-25 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-23 2:51 [RFC][PATCH 0/6] fnic: initial submission of driver for FCoE HBA jeykholt
2008-08-23 2:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/6] fnic: add main file with module infrastructure, etc jeykholt
2008-08-23 2:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/6] fnic: add fnic_scsi.c and fnic_io.h jeykholt
2008-08-25 18:22 ` Mike Christie
2008-08-25 19:15 ` James Smart
2008-08-25 19:31 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2008-08-25 19:39 ` James Smart
2008-08-25 21:01 ` Joe Eykholt
2008-08-25 21:51 ` Mike Christie
2008-08-25 21:55 ` Mike Christie
2008-08-28 1:31 ` Abhijeet Joglekar
2008-08-25 18:41 ` Mike Christie
2008-08-25 19:17 ` James Smart
2008-08-25 19:38 ` Mike Christie
2008-08-23 2:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/6] fnic: Add fnic_fcs.c and fnic_attr.c jeykholt
2008-08-23 2:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/6] fnic: add resource, interrupt, and firmware interfaces jeykholt
2008-08-23 2:52 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/6] fnic: add queue interfaces jeykholt
2008-08-23 2:53 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/6] fnic: add Makefile, patch Kconfig, MAINTAINERS, pci_ids.h jeykholt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48B30885.1010808@cs.wisc.edu \
--to=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
--cc=ajoglekar@nuovasystems.com \
--cc=jeykholt@cisco.com \
--cc=jre@nuovasystems.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox