Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/28] scsi_debug: Abort SCSI commands via .queue_reserved_command()
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 13:44:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <550f7c16-036c-409d-9f5e-0fb2a5b3baa9@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aea7f72a-7d65-4ab6-98c3-34abf112f6e1@oracle.com>

On 9/26/25 12:32 AM, John Garry wrote:
> On 24/09/2025 21:30, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> Add a .queue_reserved_command() implementation and call it from the code
>> path that aborts SCSI commands. This ensures that the code for
>> allocating a pseudo SCSI device and also the code for processing
>> reserved commands gets triggered while running blktests.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> 
> At least Suggested-by would be good, if you don't mind

If nobody objects I will add the following text:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Most of the code in this patch is a modified version of code from John
Garry. See also
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/75018e17-4dea-4e1b-8c92-7a224a1e13b9@oracle.com/

Suggested-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------------

>>   enum sdeb_defer_type {SDEB_DEFER_NONE = 0, SDEB_DEFER_HRT = 1,
>>                 SDEB_DEFER_WQ = 2, SDEB_DEFER_POLL = 3};
>> @@ -466,6 +483,8 @@ struct sdebug_defer {
>>   struct sdebug_scsi_cmd {
>>       spinlock_t   lock;
>>       struct sdebug_defer sd_dp;
>> +
>> +    struct scsi_debug_internal_cmd internal_cmd;
> 
> you could prob make this a union with sd_dp - I mean, could they ever 
> both be simultaneously used?

Introducing a union for sd_dp and internal_cmd only would suggest to
readers of the scsi_debug code that 'lock' protects both 'sd_dp' and
'internal_cmd', which is not the case. I propose to include the
following change in this patch:

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
index 0d4bdd38597a..12b885a2f719 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_debug.c
@@ -483,8 +483,6 @@ struct sdebug_defer {
  struct sdebug_scsi_cmd {
  	spinlock_t   lock;
  	struct sdebug_defer sd_dp;
-
-	struct scsi_debug_internal_cmd internal_cmd;
  };

  static atomic_t sdebug_cmnd_count;   /* number of incoming commands */
@@ -9518,7 +9516,8 @@ static const struct scsi_host_template 
sdebug_driver_template = {
  	.module =		THIS_MODULE,
  	.skip_settle_delay =	1,
  	.track_queue_depth =	1,
-	.cmd_size = sizeof(struct sdebug_scsi_cmd),
+	.cmd_size = sizeof(union { struct sdebug_scsi_cmd c;
+				   struct scsi_debug_internal_cmd ic; }),
  	.init_cmd_priv = sdebug_init_cmd_priv,
  	.target_alloc =		sdebug_target_alloc,
  	.target_destroy =	sdebug_target_destroy,

>> +static int scsi_debug_setup_abort_cmd(struct scsi_cmnd *cmd,
> 
> nobody checks the return value

Agreed. I will change the return type from 'int' into 'void'.

>> +    abort_cmd = scsi_get_internal_cmd(shost->pseudo_sdev, DMA_TO_DEVICE,
> 
> DMA_NONE?

DMA_TO_DEVICE is converted into REQ_OP_DRV_OUT by 
scsi_get_internal_cmd(). Isn't that more appropriate for an operation
that has side effects (aborting a SCSI command) rather than
REQ_OP_DRV_IN?

>> +                      BLK_MQ_REQ_RESERVED);
>> +    if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!abort_cmd))
>> +        return false;
> 
> I don't really think that this deserves a WARN_ON_ONCE

OK, I will remove the WARN_ON_ONCE().

>> +    scp->result = (res ? DID_OK : DID_ERROR) << 16;
> 
> personally I think that if-else is nicer, but that's just me
> 
> And please consider using set_host_byte()

I will use set_host_byte().

Thanks,

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-26 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-24 20:30 [PATCH v5 00/28] Optimize the hot path in the UFS driver Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 01/28] scsi: core: Support allocating reserved commands Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 02/28] scsi: core: Move two statements Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 03/28] scsi: core: Make the budget map optional Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 04/28] scsi: core: Support allocating a pseudo SCSI device Bart Van Assche
2025-09-26  7:14   ` John Garry
2025-09-26 20:01     ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-26 22:21   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 05/28] scsi: core: Introduce .queue_reserved_command() Bart Van Assche
2025-09-26  7:24   ` John Garry
2025-09-26 20:05     ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 06/28] scsi: core: Add scsi_{get,put}_internal_cmd() helpers Bart Van Assche
2025-09-25 16:38   ` John Garry
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 07/28] scsi_debug: Abort SCSI commands via .queue_reserved_command() Bart Van Assche
2025-09-26  7:32   ` John Garry
2025-09-26 20:44     ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2025-09-30  7:03       ` John Garry
2025-10-01 18:26         ` Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 08/28] ufs: core: Move an assignment in ufshcd_mcq_process_cqe() Bart Van Assche
2025-09-26  6:12   ` Avri Altman
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 09/28] ufs: core: Change the type of one ufshcd_add_cmd_upiu_trace() argument Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 10/28] ufs: core: Only call ufshcd_add_command_trace() for SCSI commands Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 11/28] ufs: core: Change the type of one ufshcd_add_command_trace() argument Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 12/28] ufs: core: Change the type of one ufshcd_send_command() argument Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 13/28] ufs: core: Only call ufshcd_should_inform_monitor() for SCSI commands Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 14/28] ufs: core: Change the monitor function argument types Bart Van Assche
2025-09-26  6:24   ` Avri Altman
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 15/28] ufs: core: Rework ufshcd_mcq_compl_pending_transfer() Bart Van Assche
2025-09-26  6:44   ` Avri Altman
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 16/28] ufs: core: Rework ufshcd_eh_device_reset_handler() Bart Van Assche
2025-09-26  7:17   ` Avri Altman
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 17/28] ufs: core: Rework the SCSI host queue depth calculation code Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 18/28] ufs: core: Allocate the SCSI host earlier Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 19/28] ufs: core: Call ufshcd_init_lrb() later Bart Van Assche
2025-09-27  9:39   ` Avri Altman
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 20/28] ufs: core: Use hba->reserved_slot Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 21/28] ufs: core: Make the reserved slot a reserved request Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 22/28] ufs: core: Do not clear driver-private command data Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 23/28] ufs: core: Optimize the hot path Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 24/28] ufs: core: Pass a SCSI pointer instead of an LRB pointer Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 25/28] ufs: core: Remove the ufshcd_lrb task_tag member Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 26/28] ufs: core: Make blk_mq_tagset_busy_iter() skip reserved requests Bart Van Assche
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 27/28] ufs: core: Move code out of ufshcd_wait_for_dev_cmd() Bart Van Assche
2025-09-27  9:11   ` Avri Altman
2025-09-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 28/28] ufs: core: Switch to scsi_get_internal_cmd() Bart Van Assche
2025-09-26 10:08 ` [PATCH v5 00/28] Optimize the hot path in the UFS driver John Garry
2025-09-26 17:32   ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=550f7c16-036c-409d-9f5e-0fb2a5b3baa9@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox