From: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
To: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com,
virtualization@lists.linux.dev, mst@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, eperezma@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] scsi: Fix can_queue comments
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 09:28:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c33e4af-0708-479b-92f3-e98c051f92e2@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260417230751.117836-2-michael.christie@oracle.com>
On 17/04/2026 23:57, Mike Christie wrote:
> The Scsi_Host can_queue comment assumes the old pre-mq can_queue use or
> it assumed host_tagset is set. This syncs the scsi_host_template and
> Scsi_Host comment so they are in sync.
>
> It also redirects the nr_hw_queues comment to can_queue so we only
> have to describe how can_queue and nr_hw_queues are related in one
> place.
>
> I also dropped the non-interrupt vs interrupt driven comment because it
> doesn't seem to apply anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>
Regardless of some nitpicking:
Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> ---
> include/scsi/scsi_host.h | 21 +++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> index f6e12565a81d..7c747b566bc3 100644
> --- a/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> +++ b/include/scsi/scsi_host.h
> @@ -381,10 +381,13 @@ struct scsi_host_template {
> const char *proc_name;
>
> /*
> - * This determines if we will use a non-interrupt driven
> - * or an interrupt driven scheme. It is set to the maximum number
> - * of simultaneous commands a single hw queue in HBA will accept
> - * excluding internal commands.
> + * If host_tagset is set, this is the maximum number of simultaneous
> + * commands the host will accept excluding internal commands.
nit: I'd have "... simultaneous commands the host will accept excluding
internal commands over all HW queues".
> + *
> + * If host_tagset is not set, this is the maximum number simultaneous
> + * commands a single hw queue in the host will accept excluding
> + * internal commands. In other words, the total queue depth per host
> + * is nr_hw_queues * can_queue.
> */
> int can_queue;
>
> @@ -631,10 +634,7 @@ struct Scsi_Host {
>
> int this_id;
>
> - /*
> - * Number of commands this host can handle at the same time.
> - * This excludes reserved commands as specified by nr_reserved_cmds.
> - */
> + /* See scsi_host_template's can_queue. */
> int can_queue;
> /*
> * Number of reserved commands to allocate, if any.
> @@ -653,10 +653,7 @@ struct Scsi_Host {
> /*
> * In scsi-mq mode, the number of hardware queues supported by the LLD.
I think that this scsi-mq comment can be removed or fixed, as we have
not had a separate mq mode in some time. I can do that as a separate
change if you like.
> *
> - * Note: it is assumed that each hardware queue has a queue depth of
> - * can_queue. In other words, the total queue depth per host
> - * is nr_hw_queues * can_queue. However, for when host_tagset is set,
> - * the total queue depth is can_queue.
> + * See scsi_host_template's can_queue for queueing requirements.
nit: I am not sure if we even need to mention this. By default, people
would or should reference scsi_host_template
> */
> unsigned nr_hw_queues;
> unsigned nr_maps;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-20 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-17 22:57 [PATCH 0/4] scsi: Support devices that don't have a cmd_per_lun limit Mike Christie
2026-04-17 22:57 ` [PATCH 1/4] scsi: Fix can_queue comments Mike Christie
2026-04-20 8:28 ` John Garry [this message]
2026-04-17 22:57 ` [PATCH 2/4] scsi: qedi: Fix command overqueueing Mike Christie
2026-04-20 16:45 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-04-20 17:47 ` Mike Christie
2026-04-20 18:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-04-20 18:48 ` Mike Christie
2026-04-17 22:57 ` [PATCH 3/4] scsi: Support scsi_devices without a device wide limit Mike Christie
2026-04-20 16:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-04-22 13:15 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-04-22 18:06 ` Mike Christie
2026-04-23 10:02 ` John Garry
2026-04-23 10:32 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-04-27 1:33 ` Martin K. Petersen
2026-04-17 22:57 ` [PATCH 4/4] virtio-scsi: " Mike Christie
2026-04-20 17:30 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2026-04-20 17:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-04-20 17:33 ` [PATCH 0/4] scsi: Support devices that don't have a cmd_per_lun limit Stefan Hajnoczi
2026-04-22 18:05 ` Mike Christie
2026-04-23 9:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
2026-04-23 16:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-04-24 5:45 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c33e4af-0708-479b-92f3-e98c051f92e2@oracle.com \
--to=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox