public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: <vkoul@kernel.org>, <kishon@kernel.org>,
	<James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	<martin.petersen@oracle.com>, <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	<andersson@kernel.org>, <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	<dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	<konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>, <quic_rdwivedi@quicinc.com>,
	<quic_cang@quicinc.com>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-phy@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 04/11] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Refactor UFS PHY reset
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 03:17:33 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6eafbd2f-e2cf-4d4b-9432-026eb9c7a01a@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mwcqp3mxuheffc6x7w4w5mykqc57ovmvyrmh3ky5czjf54wnag@fxnxgsoi6y2u>



On 5/21/2025 6:56 PM, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2025 at 09:57:15PM +0530, Nitin Rawat wrote:
>> Refactor the UFS PHY reset handling to parse the reset logic only once
>> during initialization, instead of every resume.
>>
>> As part of this change, move the UFS PHY reset parsing logic from
>> qmp_phy_power_on to the new qmp_ufs_phy_init function.
>>

Sure. I'll update the commit text in next patchset.

> 
> More importantly, you are introducing the phy_ops::init callback, which
> should've been mentioned.
> 
>> Co-developed-by: Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Ram Kumar Dwivedi <quic_rdwivedi@quicinc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c | 59 +++++++++++++------------
>>   1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
>> index ade8e9c4b9ae..33d238cf49aa 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-qmp-ufs.c
>> @@ -1800,38 +1800,11 @@ static int qmp_ufs_com_exit(struct qmp_ufs *qmp)
>>   static int qmp_ufs_power_on(struct phy *phy)
>>   {
>>   	struct qmp_ufs *qmp = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
>> -	const struct qmp_phy_cfg *cfg = qmp->cfg;
>>   	int ret;
>>   	dev_vdbg(qmp->dev, "Initializing QMP phy\n");
>>   
>> -	if (cfg->no_pcs_sw_reset) {
>> -		/*
>> -		 * Get UFS reset, which is delayed until now to avoid a
>> -		 * circular dependency where UFS needs its PHY, but the PHY
>> -		 * needs this UFS reset.
>> -		 */
>> -		if (!qmp->ufs_reset) {
>> -			qmp->ufs_reset =
>> -				devm_reset_control_get_exclusive(qmp->dev,
>> -								 "ufsphy");
>> -
>> -			if (IS_ERR(qmp->ufs_reset)) {
>> -				ret = PTR_ERR(qmp->ufs_reset);
>> -				dev_err(qmp->dev,
>> -					"failed to get UFS reset: %d\n",
>> -					ret);
>> -
>> -				qmp->ufs_reset = NULL;
>> -				return ret;
>> -			}
>> -		}
>> -	}
>> -
>>   	ret = qmp_ufs_com_init(qmp);
>> -	if (ret)
>> -		return ret;
>> -
>> -	return 0;
>> +	return ret;
> 
> This can't be:
> 	return qmp_ufs_com_init; ?

This is already taken care in next patch (#6) of this series.

Thanks,
Nitin


> 
> - Mani
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-21 21:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-15 16:27 [PATCH V5 00/11] Refactor ufs phy powerup sequence Nitin Rawat
2025-05-15 16:27 ` [PATCH V5 01/11] scsi: ufs: qcom: add a new phy calibrate API call Nitin Rawat
2025-05-18 22:50   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-05-21 13:08   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-21 21:44     ` Nitin Rawat
2025-05-15 16:27 ` [PATCH V5 02/11] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Rename qmp_ufs_enable and qmp_ufs_power_on Nitin Rawat
2025-05-21 13:09   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-15 16:27 ` [PATCH V5 03/11] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Refactor phy_power_on and phy_calibrate callbacks Nitin Rawat
2025-05-21 13:13   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-15 16:27 ` [PATCH V5 04/11] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Refactor UFS PHY reset Nitin Rawat
2025-05-21 13:26   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-21 21:47     ` Nitin Rawat [this message]
2025-05-15 16:27 ` [PATCH V5 05/11] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Remove qmp_ufs_com_init() Nitin Rawat
2025-05-21 13:30   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-21 21:49     ` Nitin Rawat
2025-05-15 16:27 ` [PATCH V5 06/11] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Rename qmp_ufs_power_off Nitin Rawat
2025-05-18 22:47   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-05-19 13:11   ` neil.armstrong
2025-05-15 16:27 ` [PATCH V5 07/11] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: Remove qmp_ufs_exit() and Inline qmp_ufs_com_exit() Nitin Rawat
2025-05-21 13:49   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-21 22:19     ` Nitin Rawat
2025-05-22  8:53       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-22  9:20         ` Nitin Rawat
2025-05-15 16:27 ` [PATCH V5 08/11] phy: qcom-qmp-ufs: refactor qmp_ufs_power_off Nitin Rawat
2025-05-21 13:50   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-15 16:27 ` [PATCH V5 09/11] scsi: ufs: qcom : Refactor phy_power_on/off calls Nitin Rawat
2025-05-21 13:57   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-21 21:40     ` Nitin Rawat
2025-05-22  8:55       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-22  9:19         ` Nitin Rawat
2025-05-15 16:27 ` [PATCH V5 10/11] scsi: ufs: qcom : Introduce phy_power_on/off wrapper function Nitin Rawat
2025-05-21 14:01   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-21 22:18     ` Nitin Rawat
2025-05-22  9:31       ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-22 10:26         ` Nitin Rawat
2025-05-15 16:27 ` [PATCH V5 11/11] scsi: ufs: qcom: Prevent calling phy_exit before phy_init Nitin Rawat
2025-05-21 14:05   ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2025-05-21 22:21     ` Nitin Rawat
2025-05-21  1:45 ` [PATCH V5 00/11] Refactor ufs phy powerup sequence Martin K. Petersen
2025-05-21 13:10   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-05-27 15:22     ` Nitin Rawat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6eafbd2f-e2cf-4d4b-9432-026eb9c7a01a@quicinc.com \
    --to=quic_nitirawa@quicinc.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=quic_cang@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_rdwivedi@quicinc.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox