From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@iokpp.de>
To: Can Guo <can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>,
bvanassche@acm.org, beanhuo@micron.com, peter.wang@mediatek.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, mani@kernel.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Tolerate RX_FOM read failures in TX EQTR
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2026 22:46:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9dcf8995008d9e8f617b416bcefb60ef9b63aedc.camel@iokpp.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260625121306.1655467-3-can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Thu, 2026-06-25 at 05:13 -0700, Can Guo wrote:
> ufshcd_get_rx_fom() aborted TX EQTR when a per-lane RX_FOM DME read failed.
> That makes the whole training flow fragile even though these reads can be
> treated as best effort.
>
> Keep TX EQTR running by logging RX_FOM read failures and continuing.
> Make failed lanes deterministic by initializing each lane FOM to 0 before
> reading and only updating it when the DME read succeeds. This avoids
> propagating stale or uninitialized values into EQTR evaluation.
>
> Also update the kerneldoc return description to match behavior: RX_FOM
> DME read failures are handled as warnings, while get_rx_fom() vops
> failures are still propagated to the caller.
>
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> drivers/ufs/core/ufs-txeq.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-txeq.c b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-txeq.c
> index 9dca0cd344b8..e1302ea9f27e 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-txeq.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufs-txeq.c
> @@ -482,7 +482,8 @@ static void ufshcd_evaluate_tx_eqtr_fom(struct ufs_hba
> *hba,
> * @h_iter: host TX EQTR iterator data structure
> * @d_iter: device TX EQTR iterator data structure
> *
> - * Returns 0 on success, negative error code otherwise
> + * Returns 0 on success, negative error code if get_rx_fom vops fails.
> + * RX_FOM DME get failures are logged and treated as 0 FOM for that lane.
> */
> static int ufshcd_get_rx_fom(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> struct ufs_pa_layer_attr *pwr_mode,
> @@ -497,8 +498,12 @@ static int ufshcd_get_rx_fom(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> ret = ufshcd_dme_peer_get(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(RX_FOM,
>
> UIC_ARG_MPHY_RX_GEN_SEL_INDEX(lane)),
> &fom);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + if (ret) {
> + h_iter->fom[lane] = 0;
> + dev_dbg(hba->dev, "Failed to get FOM for Host TX Lane
> %d: %d\n",
> + lane, ret);
> + continue;
> + }
>
> h_iter->fom[lane] = (u8)fom;
> }
> @@ -508,8 +513,12 @@ static int ufshcd_get_rx_fom(struct ufs_hba *hba,
> ret = ufshcd_dme_get(hba, UIC_ARG_MIB_SEL(RX_FOM,
> UIC_ARG_MPHY_RX_GEN_SEL_INDEX(lane)),
> &fom);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> + if (ret) {
> + d_iter->fom[lane] = 0;
> + dev_dbg(hba->dev, "Failed to get FOM for Device TX
> Lane %d: %d\n",
> + lane, ret);
> + continue;
> + }
Logic is correct, only one nit: dev_dbg() is silent in production, dev_warn or
dev_warn_ratelimited would match the stated "warnings" in the commit message
intented.
Reviewed-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-01 21:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-25 12:13 [PATCH v2 0/3] scsi: ufs: Harden TX EQTR error handling paths Can Guo
2026-06-25 12:13 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] scsi: ufs: ufs-qcom: Restore TX Equalization settings on FOM failure Can Guo
2026-07-01 20:32 ` Bean Huo
2026-06-25 12:13 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] scsi: ufs: core: Tolerate RX_FOM read failures in TX EQTR Can Guo
2026-06-26 9:04 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2026-07-01 20:46 ` Bean Huo [this message]
2026-06-25 12:13 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] scsi: ufs: core: Always run tx_eqtr POST_CHANGE notify Can Guo
2026-07-01 20:49 ` Bean Huo
2026-07-02 7:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] scsi: ufs: Harden TX EQTR error handling paths Ziqi Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9dcf8995008d9e8f617b416bcefb60ef9b63aedc.camel@iokpp.de \
--to=beanhuo@iokpp.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=can.guo@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox