From: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/10] scsi: core: Support failing requests while recovering
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 14:52:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b4cb1875-19f4-c7b0-a1d3-4f41418e44fe@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221018202958.1902564-4-bvanassche@acm.org>
On 10/18/22 3:29 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> The current behavior for SCSI commands submitted while error recovery
> is ongoing is to retry command submission after error recovery has
> finished. See also the scsi_host_in_recovery() check in
> scsi_host_queue_ready(). Add support for failing SCSI commands while
> host recovery is in progress. This functionality will be used to fix a
> deadlock in the UFS driver.
>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Cc: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> Cc: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 8 +++++---
> include/scsi/scsi_cmnd.h | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index fa96d3cfdfa3..ec890865abae 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -1341,9 +1341,6 @@ static inline int scsi_host_queue_ready(struct request_queue *q,
> struct scsi_device *sdev,
> struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
> {
> - if (scsi_host_in_recovery(shost))
> - return 0;
> -
> if (atomic_read(&shost->host_blocked) > 0) {
> if (scsi_host_busy(shost) > 0)
> goto starved;
> @@ -1732,6 +1729,11 @@ static blk_status_t scsi_queue_rq(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
> ret = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> if (!scsi_target_queue_ready(shost, sdev))
> goto out_put_budget;
> + if (unlikely(scsi_host_in_recovery(shost))) {
> + if (cmd->flags & SCMD_FAIL_IF_RECOVERING)
> + ret = BLK_STS_OFFLINE;
> + goto out_dec_target_busy;
> + }
Hey,
Will we always hit this check? For example, if we have hit the
device's queue depth limit so
scsi_mq_get_budget -> scsi_dev_queue_ready
is returning -1, will we not even call scsi_queue_rq? So because
we are in recovery and no commands are completing, we will be
stuck waiting for a token to be put back on the sdev->budget_map.
Do you need a similar check in scsi_dev_queue_ready or should
the check go in there only or can we hit a race for the latter?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-19 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-18 20:29 [PATCH v4 00/10] Fix a deadlock in the UFS driver Bart Van Assche
2022-10-18 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 01/10] scsi: core: Fix a race between scsi_done() and scsi_timeout() Bart Van Assche
2022-10-18 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 02/10] scsi: core: Change the return type of .eh_timed_out() Bart Van Assche
2022-10-20 17:22 ` Mike Christie
2022-10-18 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 03/10] scsi: core: Support failing requests while recovering Bart Van Assche
2022-10-19 19:52 ` Mike Christie [this message]
2022-10-19 21:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-10-20 17:20 ` Mike Christie
2022-10-18 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 04/10] scsi: ufs: Remove an outdated comment Bart Van Assche
2022-10-18 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 05/10] scsi: ufs: Use 'else' in ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode() Bart Van Assche
2022-10-18 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 06/10] scsi: ufs: Reduce the START STOP UNIT timeout Bart Van Assche
2022-10-18 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 07/10] scsi: ufs: Try harder to change the power mode Bart Van Assche
2022-10-18 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 08/10] scsi: ufs: Track system suspend / resume activity Bart Van Assche
2022-10-18 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 09/10] scsi: ufs: Introduce the function ufshcd_execute_start_stop() Bart Van Assche
2022-10-19 19:57 ` Mike Christie
2022-10-19 21:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-10-20 17:21 ` Mike Christie
2022-10-18 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 10/10] scsi: ufs: Fix a deadlock between PM and the SCSI error handler Bart Van Assche
2022-10-22 3:27 ` [PATCH v4 00/10] Fix a deadlock in the UFS driver Martin K. Petersen
2022-10-23 6:16 ` Avri Altman
2022-10-24 23:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-10-27 2:58 ` Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b4cb1875-19f4-c7b0-a1d3-4f41418e44fe@oracle.com \
--to=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox