From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: "Hannes Reinecke" <hare@suse.de>,
"Peter Wang (王信友)" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UFS: Make TM command timeout configurable from host side
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2025 08:40:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c1f69239-b289-455f-b1b4-89fd3a6ddcee@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b83804a8419f0e8cc1a6263144fbaf1583bab2ed.camel@mediatek.com>
On 11/13/25 2:08 AM, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:
> In the worst-case scenario (when the device is stuck), it
> may takes 1.1 seconds to abort a single task. When the queue is
> full (64), there will be noticeable lag. Aborting all
> tasks can take over a minute, which is unacceptable regardless
> of whether TM_CMD_TIMEOUT is increased or not. Under normal
> conditions, it’s very unlikely to exceed 100ms. So I think
> directly modifying TM_CMD_TIMEOUT is also acceptable,
> but I suggest keeping it within 500ms.
Hi Peter,
Aborting different commands should happen concurrently rather than
sequentially. See also the queue_delayed_work() call in the SCSI core
scsi_abort_command() function:
queue_delayed_work(shost->tmf_work_q, &scmd->abort_work, HZ / 100);
Unfortunately the max_active argument is set to 1 in the call that
creates tmf_work_q:
shost->tmf_work_q = alloc_workqueue("scsi_tmf_%d",
WQ_UNBOUND | WQ_MEM_RECLAIM | WQ_SYSFS,
1, shost->host_no);
Hannes, do you agree with increasing the max_active argument from 1 to
INT_MAX? I think the above code was introduced 12 years ago by commit
e494f6a72839 ("[SCSI] improved eh timeout handler").
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-17 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20251106012702epcas1p28fdeed020ea44f18dcc751c283fbbcc2@epcas1p2.samsung.com>
2025-11-06 1:26 ` [PATCH] UFS: Make TM command timeout configurable from host side Seunghui Lee
2025-11-11 2:46 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-11 8:44 ` Seunghui Lee
2025-11-11 9:03 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-11 16:37 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-11-12 2:58 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-12 8:49 ` Seunghui Lee
2025-11-12 9:42 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-12 16:51 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-11-13 10:08 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-17 7:11 ` Seunghui Lee
2025-11-17 8:40 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-17 9:48 ` Seunghui Lee
2025-11-18 5:48 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-17 16:43 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-11-18 5:55 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-18 17:31 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-11-19 9:20 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-17 16:40 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2025-11-18 5:52 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2025-11-11 16:38 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c1f69239-b289-455f-b1b4-89fd3a6ddcee@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox