From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.ibm.com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: alua: Fix alua_rtpg_queue()
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2022 13:22:11 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <feb72aeb-cd34-4cc0-0520-30e8a808a824@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0efc9faa6dd519d1d402a08dbedd5cd7ed0de4f5.camel@suse.com>
On 11/16/22 02:32, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-11-15 at 14:49 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
> index 610a51538f03..905b49493e01 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
> @@ -372,12 +372,13 @@ static int alua_check_vpd(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct alua_dh_data *h,
> if (pg_updated)
> list_add_rcu(&h->node, &pg->dh_list);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pg->lock, flags);
> -
> - alua_rtpg_queue(rcu_dereference_protected(h->pg,
> - lockdep_is_held(&h->pg_lock)),
> - sdev, NULL, true);
> spin_unlock(&h->pg_lock);
>
> + if (kref_get_unless_zero(&pg->kref)) {
> + alua_rtpg_queue(pg, sdev, NULL, true);
> + kref_put(&pg->kref, release_port_group);
> + }
> +
> if (old_pg)
> kref_put(&old_pg->kref, release_port_group);
>
> @@ -986,11 +987,22 @@ static bool alua_rtpg_queue(struct alua_port_group *pg,
> force = true;
> }
> if (pg->rtpg_sdev == NULL) {
> - pg->interval = 0;
> - pg->flags |= ALUA_PG_RUN_RTPG;
> - kref_get(&pg->kref);
> - pg->rtpg_sdev = sdev;
> - start_queue = 1;
> + struct alua_dh_data *h = sdev->handler_data;
> + struct alua_port_group *sdev_pg = NULL;
> +
> + if (h) {
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + sdev_pg = rcu_dereference(h->pg);
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + }
> +
> + if (pg == sdev_pg) {
> + pg->flags |= ALUA_PG_RUN_RTPG;
> + pg->interval = 0;
> + kref_get(&pg->kref);
> + pg->rtpg_sdev = sdev;
> + start_queue = 1;
> + }
> } else if (!(pg->flags & ALUA_PG_RUN_RTPG) && force) {
> pg->flags |= ALUA_PG_RUN_RTPG;
> /* Do not queue if the worker is already running */
Although I like the approach of this patch, how about the implementation below?
I think the implementation below is a little cleaner but that might be subjective ...
Thanks,
Bart.
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
index bd4ee294f5c7..d5a7d6ed5c63 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/device_handler/scsi_dh_alua.c
@@ -354,6 +354,8 @@ static int alua_check_vpd(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct alua_dh_data *h,
"%s: port group %x rel port %x\n",
ALUA_DH_NAME, group_id, rel_port);
+ kref_get(&pg->kref);
+
/* Check for existing port group references */
spin_lock(&h->pg_lock);
old_pg = rcu_dereference_protected(h->pg, lockdep_is_held(&h->pg_lock));
@@ -373,11 +375,11 @@ static int alua_check_vpd(struct scsi_device *sdev, struct alua_dh_data *h,
list_add_rcu(&h->node, &pg->dh_list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pg->lock, flags);
- alua_rtpg_queue(rcu_dereference_protected(h->pg,
- lockdep_is_held(&h->pg_lock)),
- sdev, NULL, true);
spin_unlock(&h->pg_lock);
+ alua_rtpg_queue(pg, sdev, NULL, true);
+ kref_put(&pg->kref, release_port_group);
+
if (old_pg)
kref_put(&old_pg->kref, release_port_group);
@@ -986,6 +988,9 @@ static bool alua_rtpg_queue(struct alua_port_group *pg,
{
int start_queue = 0;
unsigned long flags;
+
+ might_sleep();
+
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!pg) || scsi_device_get(sdev))
return false;
@@ -996,11 +1001,17 @@ static bool alua_rtpg_queue(struct alua_port_group *pg,
force = true;
}
if (pg->rtpg_sdev == NULL) {
- pg->interval = 0;
- pg->flags |= ALUA_PG_RUN_RTPG;
- kref_get(&pg->kref);
- pg->rtpg_sdev = sdev;
- start_queue = 1;
+ struct alua_dh_data *h = sdev->handler_data;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ if (rcu_dereference(h->pg) == pg) {
+ pg->interval = 0;
+ pg->flags |= ALUA_PG_RUN_RTPG;
+ kref_get(&pg->kref);
+ pg->rtpg_sdev = sdev;
+ start_queue = 1;
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
} else if (!(pg->flags & ALUA_PG_RUN_RTPG) && force) {
pg->flags |= ALUA_PG_RUN_RTPG;
/* Do not queue if the worker is already running */
@@ -1246,8 +1257,8 @@ static void alua_bus_detach(struct scsi_device *sdev)
spin_unlock_irq(&pg->lock);
kref_put(&pg->kref, release_port_group);
}
- sdev->handler_data = NULL;
synchronize_rcu();
+ sdev->handler_data = NULL;
kfree(h);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-16 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-15 22:49 [PATCH] scsi: alua: Fix alua_rtpg_queue() Bart Van Assche
2022-11-16 10:32 ` Martin Wilck
2022-11-16 21:22 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2022-11-17 7:03 ` Martin Wilck
2022-11-17 17:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-11-17 17:57 ` Benjamin Block
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=feb72aeb-cd34-4cc0-0520-30e8a808a824@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mwilck@suse.com \
--cc=sachinp@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox