public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ieee1394: sbp2: lower block queue alignment requirement
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:14:15 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <tkrat.cad61efa52eb6e56@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1168802387.2780.1.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>

On 14 Jan, James Bottomley wrote:
> The block layer currently provides sector (512) byte alignment
> guarantees.  However, there has been talk in SCSI of reducing that to
> word (4) since that's what most intelligent PCI controllers can cope
> with.  If you have any alignment constraints, they should be expressed
> in the slave configure.

OK, thanks. I will keep the explicit setting of the mask then.
I actually think that everything should work just fine with 4 bytes
alignment, but the SBP-2 spec mentiones 8 bytes alignment for the S/G
tables.  So maybe device firmwares will expect it that way even though
IEEE 1394 doesn't impose such a restriction even on transfers with a
payload of a multiple of 8 bytes.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== ---= -===-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV

  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-14 20:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-14 18:45 [PATCH] ieee1394: sbp2: lower block queue alignment requirement Stefan Richter
2007-01-14 19:19 ` James Bottomley
2007-01-14 20:14   ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2007-01-15 19:39     ` Kristian Høgsberg
2007-01-15 19:50       ` Mike Christie
2007-01-15 20:02       ` Stefan Richter
2007-01-15 21:24         ` James Bottomley
2007-01-25 21:35   ` Stefan Richter
2007-02-04 12:04     ` [PATCH] ieee1394: sbp2: remove unnecessary alignments of struct members Stefan Richter
2007-02-04 12:05       ` [PATCH] ieee1394: sbp2: enforce 32bit DMA mapping Stefan Richter
2007-02-04 16:06         ` David Moore
2007-02-04 19:25           ` Stefan Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=tkrat.cad61efa52eb6e56@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox