From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ieee1394: sbp2: lower block queue alignment requirement
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 21:14:15 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tkrat.cad61efa52eb6e56@s5r6.in-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1168802387.2780.1.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
On 14 Jan, James Bottomley wrote:
> The block layer currently provides sector (512) byte alignment
> guarantees. However, there has been talk in SCSI of reducing that to
> word (4) since that's what most intelligent PCI controllers can cope
> with. If you have any alignment constraints, they should be expressed
> in the slave configure.
OK, thanks. I will keep the explicit setting of the mask then.
I actually think that everything should work just fine with 4 bytes
alignment, but the SBP-2 spec mentiones 8 bytes alignment for the S/G
tables. So maybe device firmwares will expect it that way even though
IEEE 1394 doesn't impose such a restriction even on transfers with a
payload of a multiple of 8 bytes.
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-=-=== ---= -===-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-01-14 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-14 18:45 [PATCH] ieee1394: sbp2: lower block queue alignment requirement Stefan Richter
2007-01-14 19:19 ` James Bottomley
2007-01-14 20:14 ` Stefan Richter [this message]
2007-01-15 19:39 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2007-01-15 19:50 ` Mike Christie
2007-01-15 20:02 ` Stefan Richter
2007-01-15 21:24 ` James Bottomley
2007-01-25 21:35 ` Stefan Richter
2007-02-04 12:04 ` [PATCH] ieee1394: sbp2: remove unnecessary alignments of struct members Stefan Richter
2007-02-04 12:05 ` [PATCH] ieee1394: sbp2: enforce 32bit DMA mapping Stefan Richter
2007-02-04 16:06 ` David Moore
2007-02-04 19:25 ` Stefan Richter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=tkrat.cad61efa52eb6e56@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--to=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox