From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: John Meneghini <jmeneghi@redhat.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
pheidologeton@protonmail.com, kernel@roadkil.net,
maokaman@gmail.com, Sagar.Biradar@microchip.com,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, thenzl@redhat.com,
mpatalan@redhat.com, Scott.Benesh@microchip.com,
Don.Brace@microchip.com, Tom.White@microchip.com,
Abhinav.Kuchibhotla@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2]aacraid: Reply queue mapping to CPUs based on IRQ affinity
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 21:16:08 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq134fkjrlp.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <84a87c16-0738-460d-b83f-55f8181d536e@suse.de> (Hannes Reinecke's message of "Mon, 10 Mar 2025 17:44:14 +0100")
Hannes,
> Wouldn't it be an idea to check if we can make this a generic / blk-mq
> queue option instead of having each driver to implement the same
> functionality on it's own?
>
> Topic for LSF?
I would love to have a generic fix.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-11 1:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-30 17:33 [PATCH] [v2]aacraid: Reply queue mapping to CPUs based on IRQ affinity Sagar Biradar
2025-02-10 17:20 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-10 20:24 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-13 2:56 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-02-13 21:26 ` Sagar.Biradar
[not found] ` <PH7PR11MB7570E9E65153C48BA7C5679EFAFF2@PH7PR11MB7570.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2025-02-13 21:31 ` Sagar.Biradar
2025-02-13 22:03 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-13 22:21 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-21 2:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2025-02-24 21:15 ` John Meneghini
2025-03-10 16:44 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-11 1:16 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2025-03-12 1:52 ` John Meneghini
2025-03-25 0:16 ` Sagar.Biradar
2025-03-25 1:54 ` John Garry
2025-04-17 16:02 ` Sagar.Biradar
2025-04-22 6:42 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq134fkjrlp.fsf@ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com \
--to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=Abhinav.Kuchibhotla@microchip.com \
--cc=Don.Brace@microchip.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=Sagar.Biradar@microchip.com \
--cc=Scott.Benesh@microchip.com \
--cc=Tom.White@microchip.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
--cc=kernel@roadkil.net \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maokaman@gmail.com \
--cc=mpatalan@redhat.com \
--cc=pheidologeton@protonmail.com \
--cc=thenzl@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox