public inbox for linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matija Glavinic Pecotic <matija.glavinic-pecotic.ext@nsn.com>
To: ext Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@nsn.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] Revert "net: sctp: Fix a_rwnd/rwnd management to reflect real state of the receiver'
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 06:57:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <534E29D4.60100@nsn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <534C3DC2.9070604@gmail.com>

Hello Vlad,

On 04/14/2014 09:57 PM, ext Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> The base approach is sound.  The idea is to calculate rwnd based
> on receiver buffer available.  The algorithm chosen however, is
> gives a much higher preference to small data and penalizes large
> data transfers.  We need to figure our something else here..

I don't follow you here. Could you please explain what do you see as penalty?

Thanks,

Matija

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-16  6:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-14 19:45 [PATCH net] Revert "net: sctp: Fix a_rwnd/rwnd management to reflect real state of the receiver's bu Daniel Borkmann
2014-04-14 19:57 ` [PATCH net] Revert "net: sctp: Fix a_rwnd/rwnd management to reflect real state of the receiver' Vlad Yasevich
2014-04-16  6:57   ` Matija Glavinic Pecotic [this message]
2014-04-16  8:39     ` Dongsheng Song
2014-04-16  9:02       ` Alexander Sverdlin
2014-04-16 11:55         ` Matija Glavinic Pecotic
2014-04-16 13:32           ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-04-16 18:50         ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-04-16 19:05           ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-04-16 19:24             ` Matija Glavinic Pecotic
2014-04-16 19:47               ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-04-21 19:12                 ` Matija Glavinic Pecotic
2014-04-14 20:48 ` David Miller
2014-04-15  8:46   ` Alexander Sverdlin
2014-04-15  8:57     ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-04-15  6:43 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2014-04-15  7:08   ` Daniel Borkmann
2014-04-15 14:27   ` Butler, Peter
2014-04-16 18:36 ` Vlad Yasevich
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-12-23  7:13 Roger Nyberg
2015-12-23 13:18 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=534E29D4.60100@nsn.com \
    --to=matija.glavinic-pecotic.ext@nsn.com \
    --cc=alexander.sverdlin@nsn.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dborkman@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox