public inbox for linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Cc: casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
	john.johansen@canonical.com, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
	paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/25] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure.
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 21:52:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201906182147.0A592CBB62@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190618230551.7475-5-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 04:05:30PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> When more than one security module is exporting data to
> audit and networking sub-systems a single 32 bit integer
> is no longer sufficient to represent the data. Add a
> structure to be used instead.
> 
> The lsmblob structure is currently an array of
> u32 "secids". There is an entry for each of the
> security modules built into the system that would
> use secids if active. The system assigns the module
> a "slot" when it registers hooks. If modules are
> compiled in but not registered there will be unused
> slots.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/lsm_hooks.h |  1 +
>  include/linux/security.h  | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  security/security.c       | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 94 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> index 3fe39abccc8f..4d1ddf1a2aa6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> @@ -2038,6 +2038,7 @@ struct security_hook_list {
>  	struct hlist_head		*head;
>  	union security_list_options	hook;
>  	char				*lsm;
> +	int				slot;
>  } __randomize_layout;

Hm, this feels redundant (as does the existing "char *lsm") now that we
have lsm_info. The place for assigned-at-init value is blob_sizes, which
hangs off of lsm_info (as does the LSM char *)...

>  
>  /*
> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> index 49f2685324b0..28d074866895 100644
> --- a/include/linux/security.h
> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> @@ -76,6 +76,68 @@ enum lsm_event {
>  	LSM_POLICY_CHANGE,
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * Data exported by the security modules
> + */
> +#define LSMDATA_ENTRIES ( \

LSMBLOB_ENTRIES?

> +	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_SELINUX) ? 1 : 0) + \
> +	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK) ? 1 : 0) + \
> +	(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR) ? 1 : 0) )
> +
> +struct lsmblob {
> +	u32     secid[LSMDATA_ENTRIES];
> +};

Cool; I like this auto-sizing.

> +
> +#define LSMDATA_INVALID	-1
> +
> +/**
> + * lsmblob_init - initialize an lsmblob structure.
> + * @l: Pointer to the data to initialize
> + * @secid: The initial secid value
> + *
> + * Set all secid for all modules to the specified value.
> + */
> +static inline void lsmblob_init(struct lsmblob *l, u32 secid)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < LSMDATA_ENTRIES; i++)
> +		l->secid[i] = secid;

For all these LSMDATA_ENTRIES, I prefer ARRAY_SIZE(l->secid), but
*shrug*

> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * lsmblob_is_set - report if there is an value in the lsmblob
> + * @l: Pointer to the exported LSM data
> + *
> + * Returns true if there is a secid set, false otherwise
> + */
> +static inline bool lsmblob_is_set(struct lsmblob *l)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < LSMDATA_ENTRIES; i++)
> +		if (l->secid[i] != 0)
> +			return true;
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * lsmblob_equal - report if the two lsmblob's are equal
> + * @l: Pointer to one LSM data
> + * @m: Pointer to the other LSM data
> + *
> + * Returns true if all entries in the two are equal, false otherwise
> + */
> +static inline bool lsmblob_equal(struct lsmblob *l, struct lsmblob *m)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < LSMDATA_ENTRIES; i++)
> +		if (l->secid[i] != m->secid[i])
> +			return false;
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  /* These functions are in security/commoncap.c */
>  extern int cap_capable(const struct cred *cred, struct user_namespace *ns,
>  		       int cap, unsigned int opts);
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index d05f00a40e82..5aa3c052d702 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ static void __init ordered_lsm_init(void)
>  	init_debug("sock blob size       = %d\n", blob_sizes.lbs_sock);
>  	init_debug("superblock blob size = %d\n", blob_sizes.lbs_superblock);
>  	init_debug("task blob size       = %d\n", blob_sizes.lbs_task);
> +	init_debug("lsmblob size         = %lu\n", sizeof(struct lsmblob));
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Create any kmem_caches needed for blobs
> @@ -420,6 +421,11 @@ static int lsm_append(char *new, char **result)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Current index to use while initializing the lsmblob secid list.
> + */
> +static int lsm_slot __initdata;
> +
>  /**
>   * security_add_hooks - Add a modules hooks to the hook lists.
>   * @hooks: the hooks to add
> @@ -427,15 +433,40 @@ static int lsm_append(char *new, char **result)
>   * @lsm: the name of the security module
>   *
>   * Each LSM has to register its hooks with the infrastructure.
> + * If the LSM is using hooks that export secids allocate a slot
> + * for it in the lsmblob.
>   */
>  void __init security_add_hooks(struct security_hook_list *hooks, int count,
>  				char *lsm)
>  {
> +	int slot = LSMDATA_INVALID;
>  	int i;
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>  		hooks[i].lsm = lsm;
>  		hlist_add_tail_rcu(&hooks[i].list, hooks[i].head);
> +		/*
> +		 * If this is one of the hooks that uses a secid
> +		 * note it so that a slot can in allocated for the
> +		 * secid in the lsmblob structure.
> +		 */
> +		if (hooks[i].head == &security_hook_heads.audit_rule_match ||
> +		    hooks[i].head == &security_hook_heads.kernel_act_as ||
> +		    hooks[i].head ==
> +			&security_hook_heads.socket_getpeersec_dgram ||
> +		    hooks[i].head == &security_hook_heads.secctx_to_secid ||
> +		    hooks[i].head == &security_hook_heads.secid_to_secctx ||
> +		    hooks[i].head == &security_hook_heads.ipc_getsecid ||
> +		    hooks[i].head == &security_hook_heads.task_getsecid ||
> +		    hooks[i].head == &security_hook_heads.inode_getsecid ||
> +		    hooks[i].head == &security_hook_heads.cred_getsecid) {
> +			if (slot == LSMDATA_INVALID) {
> +				slot = lsm_slot++;

This needs to sanity check lsm_slot against lsmblob secids array size,
just we we catch cases cleanly if an LSM adds a hook but doesn't add
itself to the LSMDATA_ENTRIES macro.

> +				init_debug("%s assigned lsmblob slot %d\n",
> +					hooks[i].lsm, slot);
> +			}
> +		}
> +		hooks[i].slot = slot;
>  	}
>  	if (lsm_append(lsm, &lsm_names) < 0)
>  		panic("%s - Cannot get early memory.\n", __func__);
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2019-06-19  4:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-18 23:05 [PATCH v2 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 01/25] LSM: Infrastructure management of the superblock Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 02/25] LSM: Infrastructure management of the sock security Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 03/25] LSM: Infrastructure management of the key blob Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 04/25] LSM: Create and manage the lsmblob data structure Casey Schaufler
2019-06-19  4:52   ` Kees Cook [this message]
2019-06-19  6:17     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-19 16:34     ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 05/25] Use lsmblob in security_audit_rule_match Casey Schaufler
2019-06-19  4:55   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 06/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_kernel_act_as Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 07/25] net: Prepare UDS for secuirty module stacking Casey Schaufler
2019-06-19  4:59   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-19 16:42     ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 08/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secctx_to_secid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 09/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-06-19  5:03   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 10/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_ipc_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 11/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_task_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 12/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_inode_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 13/25] LSM: Use lsmblob in security_cred_getsecid Casey Schaufler
2019-06-19  5:11   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 14/25] IMA: Change internal interfaces to use lsmblobs Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 15/25] LSM: Specify which LSM to display Casey Schaufler
2019-06-19  4:33   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-19 15:33     ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-19  5:28   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-19 17:00     ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 16/25] LSM: Ensure the correct LSM context releaser Casey Schaufler
2019-06-19  5:34   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-19 17:10     ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 17/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_secid_to_secctx Casey Schaufler
2019-06-19  5:36   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 18/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_dentry_init_security Casey Schaufler
2019-06-19  5:41   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-19 17:31     ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-20 17:25       ` Kees Cook
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 19/25] LSM: Use lsmcontext in security_inode_getsecctx Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 20/25] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 21/25] Audit: Store LSM audit information in an lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 22/25] LSM: Return the lsmblob slot on initialization Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 23/25] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 24/25] Fix slotted list and getpeersec_d Casey Schaufler
2019-06-19  5:50   ` Kees Cook
2019-06-19 17:36     ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-18 23:05 ` [PATCH v2 25/25] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2019-06-19  4:34 ` [PATCH v2 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Kees Cook
2019-06-19 15:39   ` Casey Schaufler
2019-06-19 20:08   ` James Morris
2019-06-20 17:33     ` Stacked LSMs (was Re: [PATCH v2 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor) Kees Cook
2019-06-22 14:15       ` Mickaël Salaün
2019-06-19  5:21 ` [PATCH v2 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Kees Cook
2019-06-19 16:48   ` Casey Schaufler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201906182147.0A592CBB62@keescook \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox