Re: TSEM feedback.

["Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>]

On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 05:54:21AM -0500, Dr. Greg wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 10:57:08AM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> 
> Good morning, I hope the day is starting well.
> 
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 6:39???AM Dr. Greg <greg@enjellic.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Good morning Paul, I hope this note finds your week starting well.
> > >
> > > We submitted the patches for the V2 release of TSEM three weeks ago.
> > >
> > > We received some feedback from Randy Dunlap on some documentations
> > > issues that we went on to address.
> > >
> > > Haven't heard any reflections from you.  Was just wondering if you
> > > were swamped or had possibly missed the submission?  We didn't include
> > > you as a copy on the notion that you didn't need two sets of patches
> > > landing in your inbox.
> 
> > If your mail hits the mail archive on lore.kernel.org, it is almost
> > a full guarantee that it has hit my inbox and/or the patchwork
> > instance I use to ensure nothing is missed.
> 
> So noted.
> 
> > As one would expect, it takes a good deal of time to review a patch
> > submission as large as TSEM, and the rather ornate language used in
> > the documentation only slows the process.
> 
> For whatever it is worth, as a group, we invested a considerable
> amount of time, over a period of now 8+ years, in refining the
> terminology and nomenclature embodied in that document.
> 
> I guess the only defense at hand is a variant on the alleged response
> by Austrian Emperor Joseph II to Mozart's "Die Entfuhrung aus dem
> Serail":
> 
> "It contains as many words, with appropriate ornateness, as was deemed
> necessary."

I cannot let such a golden opportunity pass to use
  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gA-sEfXOaEQ