From: cem@kernel.org
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: jack@suze.cz, djwong@kernel.org, hch@lst.de, serge@hallyn.com,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org,
Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Introduce capable_noaudit
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 13:45:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260626114533.102138-1-cem@kernel.org> (raw)
From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
In some cases - filesystems quota specifically here - we'd like to check
for effective capabilities without issuing spurious audit messages and
without the need to specify a namespace for that.
This series introduce capable_noaudit() which has the same goal as
capable() but without firing audit messages.
Also, this updates both generic quota and xfs quota code to use that.
The last patch unexports has_capability_noaudit() which was originally
exported to be used in xfs but turns out it does not meet our needs.
Note this is based on top of a current series I have to remove
has_capability_noaudit() calls from xfs so the xfs patch won't
apply cleanly without that series.
If adding this helper is acceptable, I'll turn this into a non-rfc
series with the required changes to apply properly.
Comments? Flames?
Cheers
Carlos Maiolino (4):
capabily: Add new capable_noaudit
quota: Don't issue audit messages on quota enforcing
xfs: replace ns_capable_noaudit()
capability: unexport has_capability_noaudit
fs/quota/dquot.c | 2 +-
fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c | 2 +-
include/linux/capability.h | 5 +++++
kernel/capability.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--
2.54.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 11:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-26 11:45 cem [this message]
2026-06-26 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] capabily: Add new capable_noaudit cem
2026-06-26 15:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-26 15:31 ` Paul Moore
2026-06-26 17:46 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2026-06-26 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] quota: Don't issue audit messages on quota enforcing cem
2026-06-26 15:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-26 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] xfs: replace ns_capable_noaudit() cem
2026-06-26 15:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-26 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] capability: unexport has_capability_noaudit cem
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260626114533.102138-1-cem@kernel.org \
--to=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suze.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox