Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>
To: "John Ericson" <mail@johnericson.me>
Cc: "Kuniyuki Iwashima" <kuniyu@google.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Cong Wang" <cwang@multikernel.io>,
	"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
	"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>,
	"David Rheinsberg" <david@readahead.eu>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Sergei Zimmerman" <sergei@zimmerman.foo>,
	"network dev" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
	"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>,
	"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: unix_stream_connect and socket address resolution
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:05:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260722110522.710ced10@pumpkin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9c437c7c-7919-41e2-9161-fc94803a9b34@app.fastmail.com>

On Tue, 21 Jul 2026 16:37:07 -0400
"John Ericson" <mail@johnericson.me> wrote:

> In case this is useful or interesting to anyone, I deep a some history
> spelunking, and the restart logic in question seems to date back to
> Import 2.2.4pre6:
> 
> https://github.com/tbodt/linux-history/commit/7d4fc34b9bbc0a14d3e5f6b2f978373422e1ca8a#diff-0553d076c243e06ae312480cb8cb52f1cebe1d80fc099d3842593e12c9e0d4f3
> 
> ---
> @@ -673,9 +703,25 @@ static int unix_stream_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
>  	   we will have to recheck all again in any case.
>  	 */
>  
> +restart:
>  	/*  Find listening sock */
>  	other=unix_find_other(sunaddr, addr_len, sk->type, hash, &err);
>  
> +	if (!other)
> +		return -ECONNREFUSED;
> +
> +	while (other->ack_backlog >= other->max_ack_backlog) {
> +		unix_unlock(other);

This unlocks the socket - I doubt it makes sense to sleep with it locked.

> +		if (other->dead || other->state != TCP_LISTEN)
> +			return -ECONNREFUSED;

Those look like potential UAF.
Hopefully changed in the current code!

> +		if (flags & O_NONBLOCK)
> +			return -EAGAIN;
> +		interruptible_sleep_on(&unix_ack_wqueue);
> +		if (signal_pending(current))
> +			return -ERESTARTSYS;
> +		goto restart;

Since 'other' was unlocked the search must be repated.

	David

> +        }
> +
>  	/* create new sock for complete connection */
>  	newsk = unix_create1(NULL, 1);
>  
> @@ -704,7 +750,7 @@ static int unix_stream_connect(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *uaddr,
>  
>  	/* Check that listener is in valid state. */
>  	err = -ECONNREFUSED;
> -	if (other == NULL || other->dead || other->state != TCP_LISTEN)
> +	if (other->dead || other->state != TCP_LISTEN)
>  		goto out;
>  
>  	err = -ENOMEM;
> ---
> 
> My question can be basically restated: why should the `restart` label
> not go *after* the `unix_find_other` call?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> John
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-22 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-03  7:39 [RFC PATCH 0/3] coredump, net: fix layer violation with direct connection John Ericson
2026-07-03  7:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] af_unix: factor out unix_lookup_bsd_path() John Ericson
2026-07-03  7:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] af_unix: factor out kernel_unix_connect_direct() John Ericson
2026-07-18 19:55   ` unix_stream_connect and socket address resolution John Ericson
2026-07-18 20:58     ` David Laight
2026-07-19 15:37       ` John Ericson
2026-07-21 20:37         ` John Ericson
2026-07-22  7:25           ` Günther Noack
2026-07-22 10:05           ` David Laight [this message]
2026-07-03  7:39 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] coredump, net: remove `SOCK_COREDUMP` John Ericson
2026-07-03  8:11   ` Christian Brauner
2026-07-03  9:08     ` John Ericson
2026-07-03  9:31       ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260722110522.710ced10@pumpkin \
    --to=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cwang@multikernel.io \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=david@readahead.eu \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=gnoack@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mail@johnericson.me \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=sergei@zimmerman.foo \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox