Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] capabilities: limit fscaps to where CAP_SETFCAP reaches
Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2026 15:53:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261006155356.BF3DB1F0089B@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261006-b4-setfcap-userns-v1-4-f47e7ed66072@toxicpanda.com>

> Commit db2e718a4798 ("capabilities: require CAP_SETFCAP to map uid 0")
> keeps a root process without CAP_SETFCAP from creating a user namespace
> that maps uid 0, in which it could attach capabilities to a file that are
> then honoured outside.  It does not have to create one, though.  Any
> namespace will do that maps uid 0 and that it may enter, and it may enter
> all those that were created by uid 0:
> 
>   task A: uid 0, full caps          task B: uid 0, no CAP_SETFCAP
>   unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER)
>   write "0 0 1" to uid_map, gid_map
>                                     setns(A's user ns)
>                                       full capability set
>                                     setxattr(file, "security.capability")
>                                       rootid = kuid 0
>                                     (back in the initial namespace)
> [ ... ]
> own namespaces.  The rest gets -EPERM.
> 
> Fixes: 8db6c34f1dbc ("Introduce v3 namespaced file capabilities")
> Assisted-by: LLM
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261006-b4-setfcap-userns-v1-0-f47e7ed66072@toxicpanda.com?part=4


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-06 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-06 15:44 [PATCH 0/5] capabilities: close the ways around the CAP_SETFCAP rule for uid 0 Josef Bacik
2026-10-06 15:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] cred: record how far up CAP_SETFCAP reaches Josef Bacik
2026-10-06 15:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 15:44 ` [PATCH 2/5] userns: don't let setns() lend the right to map uid 0 Josef Bacik
2026-10-06 15:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 15:44 ` [PATCH 3/5] userns: check the writer too before mapping " Josef Bacik
2026-10-06 15:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-06 15:44 ` [PATCH 4/5] capabilities: limit fscaps to where CAP_SETFCAP reaches Josef Bacik
2026-10-06 15:53   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-06 15:44 ` [PATCH 5/5] capabilities: don't let ptrace borrow CAP_SETFCAP Josef Bacik
2026-10-06 15:51   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-08 13:57 ` [PATCH 0/5] capabilities: close the ways around the CAP_SETFCAP rule for uid 0 Serge E. Hallyn
2026-10-08 15:39   ` Josef Bacik
2026-10-08 16:13     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2026-10-09  7:41       ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20261006155356.BF3DB1F0089B@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox