From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
zohar@linux.ibm.com, roberto.sassu@huawei.com,
dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, eric.snowberg@oracle.com,
jarkko@kernel.org, jgg@ziepe.ca, sudeep.holla@kernel.org,
oupton@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
noodles@meta.com, sebastianene@google.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] firmware: arm_ffa: check pkvm initailised when initailise ffa driver
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 09:34:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <865x5i13dl.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260422162449.1814615-5-yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
On Wed, 22 Apr 2026 17:24:49 +0100,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com> wrote:
>
> When pKVM is enabled, the FF-A driver must be initialized after pKVM.
> Otherwise, pKVM cannot negotiate the FF-A version or
> obtain RX/TX buffer information, leading to failures in FF-A calls.
>
> During FF-A driver initialization, check whether pKVM has been initialized.
> If pKVM isn't initailised, register notifier and do initialisation
> of FF-A driver when pKVM is initialized.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h | 11 ++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kvm/pkvm.c | 2 ++
> drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/common.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/driver.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/firmware/arm_ffa/smccc.c | 2 +-
> 6 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
> index b51ab6840f9c..ad038a3b8727 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/virt.h
> @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@
> #include <asm/sysreg.h>
> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
>
> +struct notifier_block;
> +
> /*
> * __boot_cpu_mode records what mode CPUs were booted in.
> * A correctly-implemented bootloader must start all CPUs in the same mode:
> @@ -166,6 +168,15 @@ static inline bool is_hyp_nvhe(void)
> return is_hyp_mode_available() && !is_kernel_in_hyp_mode();
> }
>
> +enum kvm_arm_event {
> + PKVM_INITIALISED,
> + KVM_ARM_EVENT_MAX,
> +};
Well, no.
You are adding a whole infrastructure for something that happens
*once* in the lifetime of the system. What's next? D-Bus?
We already have a dependency mechanism, which I pointed to you last
time, and that you conveniently ignored. If that's not working for
you, then consider improving it.
If we had a whole set of in-kernel users depending on some global KVM
state change, we could look into it. But they are none, and all KVM
state changes are per-vcpu rather global.
So I'm not entertaining this invasive infrastructure for something so
limited.
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-23 8:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-22 16:24 [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] fix FF-A call failed with pKVM when ff-a driver is built-in Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] security: ima: call ima_init() again at late_initcall_sync for defered TPM Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 17:20 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-04-22 18:46 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 19:41 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 21:20 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-04-23 5:55 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-23 11:01 ` Mimi Zohar
2026-04-23 11:20 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-23 12:34 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] tpm: tpm_crb_ffa: revert defered_probed when tpm_crb_ffa is built-in Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-23 10:17 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2026-04-22 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] firmware: arm_ffa: revert ffa_init() initcall level to device_initcall Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-23 9:13 ` Sudeep Holla
2026-04-22 16:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] firmware: arm_ffa: check pkvm initailised when initailise ffa driver Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-23 8:34 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2026-04-23 10:29 ` Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=865x5i13dl.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noodles@meta.com \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=sebastianene@google.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox