Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	selinux@vger.kernel.org, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Micah Morton <mortonm@chromium.org>,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selinux: treat atomic flags more carefully
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 06:45:43 +1100 (AEDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2001080644500.575@namei.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200107133154.588958-2-omosnace@redhat.com>

On Tue, 7 Jan 2020, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:

> The disabled/enforcing/initialized flags are all accessed concurrently
> by threads so use the appropriate accessors that ensure atomicity and
> document that it is expected.
> 
> Use smp_load/acquire...() helpers (with memory barriers) for the
> initialized flag, since it gates access to the rest of the state
> structures.
> 
> Note that the disabled flag is currently not used for anything other
> than avoiding double disable, but it will be used for bailing out of
> hooks once security_delete_hooks() is removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>


Reviewed-by: James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>

-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-01-07 19:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-07 13:31 [PATCH 0/2] LSM: Drop security_delete_hooks() Ondrej Mosnacek
2020-01-07 13:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] selinux: treat atomic flags more carefully Ondrej Mosnacek
2020-01-07 14:45   ` Stephen Smalley
2020-01-07 18:09   ` Kees Cook
2020-01-07 19:45   ` James Morris [this message]
2020-01-10 20:22     ` Paul Moore
2020-01-10 20:21   ` Paul Moore
2020-01-07 13:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] security,selinux: get rid of security_delete_hooks() Ondrej Mosnacek
2020-01-07 14:47   ` [PATCH 2/2] security, selinux: " Stephen Smalley
2020-01-08  5:31     ` Paul Moore
2020-01-08  8:15       ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2020-01-08 13:45         ` Paul Moore
2020-01-08 14:49       ` Stephen Smalley
2020-01-07 16:46   ` [PATCH 2/2] security,selinux: " Casey Schaufler
2020-01-07 18:10   ` Kees Cook
2020-01-07 19:59   ` James Morris
2020-01-08  8:21     ` Ondrej Mosnacek
2020-01-08 18:47       ` James Morris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.21.2001080644500.575@namei.org \
    --to=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mortonm@chromium.org \
    --cc=omosnace@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox