Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/11] fs: add mnt_undo_legitimize()
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 16:59:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-170180@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013164800.2906577-8-utilityemal77@gmail.com>

> A failed __legitimize_mnt() can oblige its caller to mntput() the
> mount, which may be the final put and so may sleep: legitimize_mnt()
> leaves the RCU read-side critical section it ran under to do it.  A
> caller that cannot leave its critical section - a BPF program driving
> a lockless walk, which only the verifier ends - needs that put to be
> callable from inside it.
> 
> Add mnt_undo_legitimize(), which drops the count and, when the count
> turns out to be the mount's last, keeps it and hands the mount to
> delayed_mntput() for the sleepable final put.  delayed_mntput() then
> tells the two queue populations apart by MNT_DOOMED rather than by an
> unlocked mnt_get_count() read, which a concurrent failed
> __legitimize_mnt() could transiently inflate.  legitimize_mnt()
> switches to it as well, retiring its
> rcu_read_unlock/mntput/rcu_read_lock dance.
> 
> Unlike mntput(), mnt_expiry_mark is left alone: a walker that failed
> to legitimize a mount never used it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261013164800.2906577-1-utilityemal77@gmail.com?part=7


  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-13 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-13 16:47 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/11] fs: unified VFS ancestor walk for Landlock and BPF Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/11] namei: introduce __path_walk_parent() Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/11] namei: add vfs_walk_ancestors() Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/11] landlock: convert ancestor walk to vfs_walk_ancestors() Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/11] namei: expose the stepwise ancestor walk to fs/ Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/11] bpf: add a path ancestor iterator Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 18:00     ` Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/11] selftests/bpf: exercise the " Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 19:50   ` Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/11] fs: add mnt_undo_legitimize() Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:59   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/11] namei: add an rcu-walk mode to the ancestor walk Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:56     ` Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/11] bpf: support "__uninit" iterator arguments in generic kfuncs Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/11] bpf: add a lockless path ancestor iterator Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 11/11] selftests/bpf: exercise the " Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:50   ` bot+bpf-ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-170180@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox