Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Justin Suess" <utilityemal77@gmail.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/11] bpf: add a path ancestor iterator
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 17:11:54 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-170194@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261013164800.2906577-6-utilityemal77@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] bpf: deadlock in bpf_iter_path_ancestors_next due to GFP_KERNEL under VFS locks
--

commit 0d24b2f0561971ff2a9d89456692d9ec1ea13279
Author: Justin Suess <utilityemal77@gmail.com>

bpf: add a path ancestor iterator

This commit introduces a sleepable BPF iterator for evaluating a path's
ancestry using the stepwise vfs_walk_ancestors() engine. It adds kfuncs
to manage the iterator and hands each position to the program as an
acquired reference by allocating a copy of the path structure.

> diff --git a/fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c b/fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c
> index 08f0847c49708..02398f5a46d5a 100644
> --- a/fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c
> +++ b/fs/bpf_fs_kfuncs.c
[ ... ]
> +__bpf_kfunc struct path *
> +bpf_iter_path_ancestors_next(struct bpf_iter_path_ancestors *it)
> +{
> +	struct bpf_path_ancestors_kern *kit = (void *)it;
> +	struct path *pos = bpf_path_ancestors_step(kit);
> +	struct path *held;
> +
> +	if (!pos)
> +		return NULL;
> +	/*
> +	 * The position must outlive the walk's own view of it, so it gets a
> +	 * reference and a struct path of its own to live in: struct path is
> +	 * a value type, with nothing a BPF reference could be taken on
> +	 * otherwise.  Sleepable, so no atomic allocation.
> +	 */
> +	held = kmalloc_obj(*held);

[Severity: High]
Can this allocation cause a deadlock if the iterator is used from a sleepable
LSM hook?

If a sleepable BPF LSM program is attached to a hook like
security_inode_setattr or security_inode_unlink, it is called by the VFS
with the inode's i_rwsem held. 

The kmalloc_obj() macro appears to default to GFP_KERNEL allocations, which
includes the __GFP_FS flag. Under memory pressure, this could trigger direct
memory reclaim.

If reclaim attempts to write back dirty pages or shrink the dcache/icache,
it might try to acquire the same i_rwsem, resulting in a deadlock.

> +	if (!held) {
> +		kit->step = -ENOMEM;
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +	*held = *pos;
> +	path_get(held);
> +	return held;
> +}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261013164800.2906577-1-utilityemal77@gmail.com?part=5

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-13 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-13 16:47 [PATCH bpf-next v1 00/11] fs: unified VFS ancestor walk for Landlock and BPF Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 01/11] namei: introduce __path_walk_parent() Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 02/11] namei: add vfs_walk_ancestors() Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 03/11] landlock: convert ancestor walk to vfs_walk_ancestors() Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:55   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 04/11] namei: expose the stepwise ancestor walk to fs/ Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 05/11] bpf: add a path ancestor iterator Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:11   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-13 18:00     ` Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/11] selftests/bpf: exercise the " Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 19:50   ` Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 07/11] fs: add mnt_undo_legitimize() Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:59   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/11] namei: add an rcu-walk mode to the ancestor walk Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:56     ` Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 09/11] bpf: support "__uninit" iterator arguments in generic kfuncs Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:47 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 10/11] bpf: add a lockless path ancestor iterator Justin Suess
2026-10-13 17:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 16:48 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 11/11] selftests/bpf: exercise the " Justin Suess
2026-10-13 16:57   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 17:50   ` bot+bpf-ci

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-170194@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=utilityemal77@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox