Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] smack: Use security_capable_lsm() for privilege checks
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 20:45:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-207727@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110203042.2410140-5-mic@digikod.net>

> smack_privileged_cred() checks the capabilities that guard Smack policy
> (CAP_MAC_ADMIN to change it, CAP_MAC_OVERRIDE to bypass it, and
> CAP_SYS_PTRACE for the ptrace rule) with cap_capable() instead of
> capable(), so that other stacked LSMs are not asked (see commit
> f28e783ff668 ("Smack: Use cap_capable in privilege check")).  This also
> lets a process in a Landlock domain that denies these capabilities
> manage or bypass Smack policy.
> 
> Switch this check to security_capable_lsm(), as for AppArmor in the
> previous commit.  The onlycap rule still applies.
> smack_privileged_cred() may check another task's credentials (the
> tracer's for the ptrace rule, the SIGIO recipient's), and may run in
> interrupt context for SIGIO delivery, which the capable_lsm hook allows.
> 
> Smack passes CAP_OPT_NONE everywhere, so Landlock logs every denial of
> these capabilities like any other capability denial.  This includes the
> checks that some Smack hooks make before their label rules (e.g.
> smack_syslog(), smack_unix_may_send()): the override is denied, and the
> label rules then decide.
> 
> Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> Cc: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
> Cc: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
> Fixes: 97c8386f1d74 ("landlock: Enforce capability restrictions")
> Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>

Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261110203042.2410140-1-mic@digikod.net?part=4


  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-10 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-10 20:30 [PATCH 0/6] Fix Landlock mediation of capabilities guarding LSM policies Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:30 ` [PATCH 1/6] lsm: Add a capable_lsm hook for capabilities guarding an LSM's policy Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 20:30 ` [PATCH 2/6] landlock: Restrict capabilities guarding other LSMs' policies Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 20:30 ` [PATCH 3/6] apparmor: Use security_capable_lsm() for policy capabilities Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 20:30 ` [PATCH 4/6] smack: Use security_capable_lsm() for privilege checks Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:45   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-10 20:30 ` [PATCH 5/6] selinux: Use security_capable_lsm() for CAP_MAC_ADMIN checks Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 20:47   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-10 20:30 ` [PATCH 6/6] selftests/landlock: Test capabilities guarding other LSMs' policies Mickaël Salaün
2026-11-10 21:02   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-207727@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox