* [PATCH] serial: ifx6x60: add_timer is not safe in the mrdy_assert function
@ 2012-10-22 14:23 Jun Chen
2012-10-22 9:55 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jun Chen @ 2012-10-22 14:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: alan; +Cc: linux-serial, russ.gorby, chuansheng.liu, chao.bi
This patch make use of mod_timer instead of add_timer in the mrdy_assert function.
Because the srdy interrupter can go high when we are running function mrdy_assert and mrdy_assert
can be called by multi-entry. In our medfield platform, spi stress test can encounter this
error logs triggered by the BUG_ON of add_timer function.This patch had been tested on
our medfield platform.
the scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
mrdy_assert
set_bit(IFX_SPI_STATE_TIMER_PENDING)
ifx_spi_handle_srdy
...
clear_bit(IFX_SPI_STATE_TIMER_PENDING)
...
mrdy_assert
set_bit(IFX_SPI_STATE_TIMER_PENDING)
...
add_timer
...
add_timer
cc:liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
cc:Bi Chao <chao.bi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chen Jun <jun.d.chen@intel.com>
---
drivers/tty/serial/ifx6x60.c | 4 +---
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/ifx6x60.c b/drivers/tty/serial/ifx6x60.c
index 769396a..e56ed33 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/ifx6x60.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/ifx6x60.c
@@ -190,9 +190,7 @@ static void mrdy_assert(struct ifx_spi_device *ifx_dev)
if (!val) {
if (!test_and_set_bit(IFX_SPI_STATE_TIMER_PENDING,
&ifx_dev->flags)) {
- ifx_dev->spi_timer.expires =
- jiffies + IFX_SPI_TIMEOUT_SEC*HZ;
- add_timer(&ifx_dev->spi_timer);
+ mod_timer(&ifx_dev->spi_timer,jiffies + IFX_SPI_TIMEOUT_SEC*HZ);
}
}
--
1.7.4.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH] serial: ifx6x60: add_timer is not safe in the mrdy_assert function
2012-10-22 14:23 [PATCH] serial: ifx6x60: add_timer is not safe in the mrdy_assert function Jun Chen
@ 2012-10-22 9:55 ` Alan Cox
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alan Cox @ 2012-10-22 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jun Chen; +Cc: alan, linux-serial, russ.gorby, chuansheng.liu, chao.bi
On Mon, 22 Oct 2012 10:23:07 -0400
Jun Chen <jun.d.chen@intel.com> wrote:
>
> This patch make use of mod_timer instead of add_timer in the mrdy_assert function.
> Because the srdy interrupter can go high when we are running function mrdy_assert and mrdy_assert
> can be called by multi-entry. In our medfield platform, spi stress test can encounter this
> error logs triggered by the BUG_ON of add_timer function.This patch had been tested on
> our medfield platform.
>
> the scenario:
> CPU0 CPU1
> mrdy_assert
> set_bit(IFX_SPI_STATE_TIMER_PENDING)
> ifx_spi_handle_srdy
> ...
> clear_bit(IFX_SPI_STATE_TIMER_PENDING)
> ...
> mrdy_assert
> set_bit(IFX_SPI_STATE_TIMER_PENDING)
> ...
> add_timer
> ...
> add_timer
>
> cc:liu chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@intel.com>
> cc:Bi Chao <chao.bi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Jun <jun.d.chen@intel.com>
Acked-by: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-10-22 9:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-10-22 14:23 [PATCH] serial: ifx6x60: add_timer is not safe in the mrdy_assert function Jun Chen
2012-10-22 9:55 ` Alan Cox
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox