From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
To: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@linaro.org>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
Lior Amsalem <alior@marvell.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
Matt Porter <matt.porter@linaro.org>,
Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_dw: Fix LCR workaround regression
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:05:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2515351.7napg2VnCT@radagast> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAYSxhr10XqQdQrvGf3Ez6e4LSbvmc0J-=yRgUePVEcd93e5wQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2542 bytes --]
On Wednesday 11 December 2013 13:00:33 Tim Kryger wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Heikki Krogerus
>
> <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:28:04PM +0000, James Hogan wrote:
> >> From: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
> >>
> >> Commit c49436b657d0 (serial: 8250_dw: Improve unwritable LCR workaround)
> >> caused a regression. It added a check that the LCR was written properly
> >> to detect and workaround the busy quirk, but the behaviour of bit 5
> >> (UART_LCR_SPAR) differs between IP versions 3.00a and 3.14c per the
> >> docs. On older versions this caused the check to fail and it would
> >> repeatedly force idle and rewrite the LCR register, causing delays and
> >> preventing any input from serial being received.
> >>
> >> This is fixed by masking out UART_LCR_SPAR before making the comparison.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> >> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
> >> Cc: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@linaro.org>
> >> Cc: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
> >> Cc: Matt Porter <matt.porter@linaro.org>
> >> Cc: Markus Mayer <markus.mayer@linaro.org>
> >> Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
> >> Tested-by: Tim Kryger <tim.kryger@linaro.org>
> >> Tested-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>
> >
> > I tested this with HW without the busy functionality
> > (UART_16550_COMPATIBLE == yes). No problems here. FWIW:
> >
> > Tested-by: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>
>
> Greg, can you consider taking this patch as a regression fix for 3.13?
>
> Just in case you want a little more background beyond what is in the
> commit message...
>
> Statically declared DW UARTs will execute autoconfig_16550a during
> probe which attempts to set the SPAR bit of LCR. Some old versions of
> the DW IP don't implement the stick parity feature and for these
> versions the SPAR bit always reads back as zero. Since these writes
> aren't fully accepted by the hardware, they trigger the workaround
> which interprets the partially rejected write to mean the UART was
> busy. A number of attempts are made to idle the UART and re-write the
> LCR but eventually the workaround gives up and prints a warning. DT
> declared DW UARTs don't run autoconfig and don't see this issue as far
> as I know.
Hi Tim
Thanks for the extra description. FYI, I was instantiating DW UART from DT
when I saw the problem.
Cheers
James
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-11 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-10 22:28 [PATCH] serial: 8250_dw: Fix LCR workaround regression James Hogan
2013-12-11 14:00 ` Heikki Krogerus
2013-12-11 21:00 ` Tim Kryger
2013-12-11 21:05 ` James Hogan [this message]
2013-12-12 1:00 ` Tim Kryger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2515351.7napg2VnCT@radagast \
--to=james.hogan@imgtec.com \
--cc=alior@marvell.com \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus.mayer@linaro.org \
--cc=matt.porter@linaro.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=tim.kryger@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox