Re: [PATCH 0/6] sc16is7xx: Hardware flow control fixes

[Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:37:01AM +0100, Tomasz Moń wrote:
> On 25.02.2022 10:25, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 11:56:12AM +0100, Tomasz Moń wrote:
> >> sc16is7xx driver assumes that the device handles hardware flow control
> >> automatically. This is not really true as the driver does inadvertently
> >> clear the bits that enable hardware flow control.
> >>
> >> This patch series solves multiple issues present in the driver. While
> >> the patches are fairly independent, there are some dependencies. The
> >> "sc16is7xx: Properly resume TX after stop" adds IER bit set function
> >> that is later used in "sc16is7xx: Set AUTOCTS and AUTORTS bits". Also
> >> the patches that control which interrupts are enabled are dependent on
> >> each other.
> >>
> >> Patches should be applied respecting the order in the series. The whole
> >> series applies on top of "sc16is7xx: Fix for incorrect data being
> >> transmitted" [1].
> > 
> > The first 3 patches of this series applied.  Please rebase and resend
> > the remaining.
> 
> The remaining patches did not apply because the "sc16is7xx: Fix for
> incorrect data being transmitted" by Phil Elwell was not applied.
> 
> The Phil Elwell patch was independently developed and made it to the
> list before I sent the patch series. For that reason I based the series
> on top of that patch and mentioned it in the cover letter.

If that patch was not applied, then just rebase your series on my branch
and resend it.

thanks,

greg k-h