From: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@just42.net>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Regression] CH341 USB-serial converter passes data in 32 byte chunks
Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2022 12:19:02 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YtTKHhdfq5cM0G4G@marvin.atrad.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Ys4QOgNF0pJDwRCJ@marvin.atrad.com.au>
On Wed, Jul 13, 2022 at 09:52:20AM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 06:53:38PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 02:43:41PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 09:29:57PM +0930, Jonathan Woithe wrote:
> > > > It would be great if this regression could be addressed. At present I must
> > > > boot a pre-4.10 kernel whenever I need to use the programming dongle with
> > > > this converter.
> > > >
> > > > Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help resolve the
> > > > problem.
> > >
> > > If you revert this commit on top of the latest kernel release, does it
> > > solve the problem for you?
> >
> > Simply reverting the commit blamed by the bisection should only makes
> > things worse, at least for some device types.
> >
> > Perhaps we need to set that bit 7 based on the type, even if the bit
> > meaning having been inverted seems a bit far-fetched.
> >
> > Jonathan, could you try simply commenting out the
> >
> > val |= BIT(7);
> >
> > statement in ch341_set_baudrate_lcr()?
>
> Commenting out the above line brought some improvement. In minicom with a
> loopback connector in place, the first byte sent does not get echoed
> back at all. However, all other bytes are echoed as soon as they are sent.
>
> The kernel used for the above test was 672c0c5 (5.18-rc5), which is the most
> recent I can conveniently get onto the test machine at present. I tested
> the unmodified kernel before commenting out the line and confirmed that it
> exhibited the full fault condition (bytes come back in blocks of 32).
>
> > Also, what chip version do you have (see debug statement in
> > ch341_configure())?
>
> Chip revision is 0x27.
Is there anything further I can do or provide to help identify a solution to
the regression?
Regards
jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-18 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-12 11:59 [Regression] CH341 USB-serial converter passes data in 32 byte chunks Jonathan Woithe
2022-07-12 12:43 ` Greg KH
2022-07-12 16:53 ` Johan Hovold
2022-07-13 0:22 ` Jonathan Woithe
2022-07-18 2:49 ` Jonathan Woithe [this message]
2022-07-18 8:53 ` Johan Hovold
2022-07-18 14:16 ` Johan Hovold
2022-07-19 3:59 ` Jonathan Woithe
2022-07-19 5:53 ` Johan Hovold
2022-07-19 6:34 ` Jonathan Woithe
2022-07-19 7:20 ` Johan Hovold
2022-07-19 8:05 ` Jonathan Woithe
2022-07-19 12:18 ` Jonathan Woithe
2022-07-23 10:57 ` Johan Hovold
2022-07-25 23:45 ` Jonathan Woithe
2022-07-29 9:10 ` Johan Hovold
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YtTKHhdfq5cM0G4G@marvin.atrad.com.au \
--to=jwoithe@just42.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox