[PATCH 00/11] use of_property_read_bool

[PATCH 00/11] use of_property_read_bool

[Julia Lawall]

Use of_property_read_bool to check for the existence of a property.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression e1,e2;
statement S2,S1;
@@
-       if (of_get_property(e1,e2,NULL))
+       if (of_property_read_bool(e1,e2))
        S1 else S2
// </smpl>

---

 arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c                  |    2 +-
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mpc.c                |    2 +-
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-esdhc.c           |    2 +-
 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/xgmac_mdio.c |    3 +--
 drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c                  |    2 +-
 drivers/pinctrl/nomadik/pinctrl-nomadik.c   |    2 +-
 drivers/soc/fsl/qe/qe_tdm.c                 |    2 +-
 drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c            |    2 +-
 drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c           |    8 ++++----
 drivers/usb/host/fsl-mph-dr-of.c            |    6 +++---
 sound/soc/codecs/ab8500-codec.c             |   10 +++++-----
 sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c                     |    2 +-
 sound/soc/soc-core.c                        |    2 +-
 13 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

[PATCH 05/11] tty/serial: at91: use of_property_read_bool

[Julia Lawall]

Use of_property_read_bool to check for the existence of a property.

The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression e1,e2;
statement S2,S1;
@@
-       if (of_get_property(e1,e2,NULL))
+       if (of_property_read_bool(e1,e2))
        S1 else S2
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>

---
 drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
index 2eaa18d..c57a51d 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/atmel_serial.c
@@ -1634,8 +1634,8 @@ static void atmel_init_property(struct atmel_uart_port *atmel_port,
 
 	if (np) {
 		/* DMA/PDC usage specification */
-		if (of_get_property(np, "atmel,use-dma-rx", NULL)) {
-			if (of_get_property(np, "dmas", NULL)) {
+		if (of_property_read_bool(np, "atmel,use-dma-rx")) {
+			if (of_property_read_bool(np, "dmas")) {
 				atmel_port->use_dma_rx  = true;
 				atmel_port->use_pdc_rx  = false;
 			} else {
@@ -1647,8 +1647,8 @@ static void atmel_init_property(struct atmel_uart_port *atmel_port,
 			atmel_port->use_pdc_rx  = false;
 		}
 
-		if (of_get_property(np, "atmel,use-dma-tx", NULL)) {
-			if (of_get_property(np, "dmas", NULL)) {
+		if (of_property_read_bool(np, "atmel,use-dma-tx")) {
+			if (of_property_read_bool(np, "dmas")) {
 				atmel_port->use_dma_tx  = true;
 				atmel_port->use_pdc_tx  = false;
 			} else {

Re: [PATCH 10/11] soc: ti: knav_qmss_queue: use of_property_read_bool

[Julia Lawall]

On Fri, 5 Aug 2016, Robin Murphy wrote:

> Hi Julia,
>
> On 05/08/16 09:56, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > Use of_property_read_bool to check for the existence of a property.
>
> This caught my eye since Rob told me off for doing the same recently[1].
>
> > The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
> > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> >
> > // <smpl>
> > @@
> > expression e1,e2;
> > statement S2,S1;
> > @@
> > -       if (of_get_property(e1,e2,NULL))
> > +       if (of_property_read_bool(e1,e2))
> >         S1 else S2
> > // </smpl>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
> >
> > ---
> >  drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c |    2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
> > index b73e353..56b5d7c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/ti/knav_qmss_queue.c
> > @@ -1240,7 +1240,7 @@ static int knav_setup_queue_range(struct knav_device *kdev,
> >  	if (of_get_property(node, "qalloc-by-id", NULL))
>
> According to the binding, "qalloc-by-id" _is_ a boolean property, so
> this one really does deserve to be of_property_read_bool()...
>
> >  		range->flags |= RANGE_RESERVED;
> >
> > -	if (of_get_property(node, "accumulator", NULL)) {
> > +	if (of_property_read_bool(node, "accumulator")) {
>
> ...whereas "accumulator" must have a value, so this isn't technically
> appropriate. In general, most of these "if the property exists, read the
> property and do stuff" checks are probably a sign of code that could be
> simplified by refactoring the "do stuff" step to just specifically
> handle the "read the property" step returning -EINVAL when it's not present.

Thanks for the very helpful feedback.  I will rethink the patch set in
light of this information.

julia

> Robin.
>
> [1]:https://www.mail-archive.com/iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org/msg13375.html
>
> >  		ret = knav_init_acc_range(kdev, node, range);
> >  		if (ret < 0) {
> >  			devm_kfree(dev, range);
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>