From: Xin Chen <xin.chen2@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: jirislaby@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, liulzhao@qti.qualcomm.com,
cheng.jiang@oss.qualcomm.com, cxin@qti.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] tty: n_tty: use kvzalloc/kvfree for line discipline data
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 14:39:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d81e6acb-2e88-4bad-bc49-5259e16d3cf1@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026081841-relation-barn-304e@gregkh>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2026, Greg KH wrote:
> What specific "damage"?
The specific damage is that hci_send_cmd_sync() calls
skb_clone(hdev->sent_cmd, GFP_KERNEL) to set hdev->req_skb. If
that clone fails, hdev->req_skb stays NULL. When the firmware reply
arrives, hci_req_cmd_complete() checks hdev->req_skb to find the
registered completion callback; finding NULL, it never calls
hci_cmd_sync_complete(), req_status stays HCI_REQ_PEND, and the
waiter in __hci_cmd_sync_sk() times out with -ETIMEDOUT. The command
was sent and the firmware replied successfully — the damage is purely
that the completion path is broken.
> But it's not consuming them "unnecessarily" as the memory is needed.
> Why not fix the root problem here of having this be called so many
> times that you are running out of memory?
The repeated calls are a normal consequence of the serdev open/close
retry logic in the BT transport layer; constraining that would require
changes in a different subsystem and would not address the underlying
fragility. The real question is why skb_clone(GFP_KERNEL) fails at
all when the system is not truly OOM.
> And why isn't memory being reclaimed properly if we do not have any
> left in that free list? The allocation can sleep, so it should be
> always succeeding if the system isn't truly out of memory, as you
> imply it is not.
This is the crux of the issue. vzalloc() allocates order-0 pages
through vm_area_alloc_pages(), which takes the bulk allocation path
(alloc_pages_bulk_noprof) for order-0. The bulk allocator uses
ALLOC_WMARK_LOW and does not perform direct reclaim — it is
intentionally a fast, non-sleeping path. When the low watermark check
fails it falls through to goto failed, and vm_area_alloc_pages()
falls back to single-page alloc_pages() calls which can reclaim.
So vzalloc() itself can succeed even under pressure, but only after
consuming whatever order-0 pages were available via the bulk path first.
The problem is that skb_clone(GFP_KERNEL) in hci_send_cmd_sync()
is a single kmalloc-backed allocation. It does not retry on failure
and has no reclaim loop of its own; if the zone is below the low
watermark at the moment it runs, it fails and returns NULL. The window
is narrow but real: the bulk path in vzalloc() drains the PCP/buddy
order-0 lists below the low watermark; skb_clone() runs before
kswapd has had a chance to refill them; it fails silently.
Switching to kvzalloc_obj() serves the ~10 KB n_tty_data from the
kmalloc-16384 slab (an order-2 compound page), which does not touch
the order-0 free list at all, eliminating the pressure window entirely.
Thanks,
Xin Chen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-18 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-17 13:55 [PATCH v1] tty: n_tty: use kvzalloc/kvfree for line discipline data Xin Chen
2026-08-17 14:14 ` Greg KH
2026-08-18 3:09 ` Xin Chen
2026-08-18 6:05 ` Greg KH
2026-08-18 6:22 ` Xin Chen
2026-08-17 14:16 ` Greg KH
2026-08-17 14:49 ` Greg KH
2026-08-18 6:02 ` Xin Chen
2026-08-18 6:34 ` Greg KH
2026-08-18 6:58 ` Xin Chen
2026-08-18 7:34 ` Greg KH
2026-08-18 3:31 ` Xin Chen
2026-08-18 6:07 ` Greg KH
2026-08-18 6:39 ` Xin Chen [this message]
2026-08-18 7:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Xin Chen
2026-08-18 7:15 ` Jiri Slaby
2026-08-18 7:23 ` Xin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d81e6acb-2e88-4bad-bc49-5259e16d3cf1@oss.qualcomm.com \
--to=xin.chen2@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=cheng.jiang@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=cxin@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liulzhao@qti.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox