Linux Serial subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] serial: 8250: drop err label from serial8250_register_8250_port()
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:49:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-170892@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <baf799ad88f9ef43093ae96731f48a5e88d726dd.1791873876.git.jirislaby@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] tty: serial: 8250: missing cancel_delayed_work_sync() for overrun_backoff
- [High] tty: serial: 8250: workqueue list corruption via INIT_DELAYED_WORK()
--

commit c4166af59c093eb0e0aed408aac8356ad1cf88f2
Author: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@kernel.org>

serial: 8250: drop err label from serial8250_register_8250_port()

This commit refactors serial8250_register_8250_port() to eliminate
goto-based error handling while holding a guard() lock. The port
configuration logic is moved into a new helper,
__serial8250_register_8250_port(), which returns an int and uses plain
returns on failures. The caller then handles resetting uart->port.dev in a
single place.

> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> index 11424fef7c08b..7ff307ce6aa88 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> @@ -743,46 +743,12 @@ static void serial_8250_overrun_backoff_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  	serial_out(up, UART_IER, up->ier);
>  }

[Severity: High]
Can this background work access hardware registers after the port is
unregistered?

When a port is removed (such as during hot-unplug or driver unbind), it
appears there is no matching cancel_delayed_work_sync() for the
overrun_backoff work. 

If the device memory is unmapped and the delayed work executes, will this
serial_out() trigger a synchronous external abort or use-after-free?

[ ... ]

> @@ -927,9 +891,51 @@ int serial8250_register_8250_port(const struct uart_8250_port *up)
>  	}
>  
>  	return ret;
> +}

[Severity: High]
Does this new helper unconditionally re-initialize the delayed work without
checking if it is already pending?

If a device is unbound and then rebound while the overrun_backoff work is
still pending, __serial8250_register_8250_port() is called again. Towards the
end of the helper, the work is initialized:

	if (up->overrun_backoff_time_ms > 0) {
		...
		INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&uart->overrun_backoff,
				serial_8250_overrun_backoff_work);
	}

Re-initializing an active delayed work item with INIT_DELAYED_WORK() calls
INIT_LIST_HEAD() on its list nodes.

Can this corrupt the timer or workqueue linked lists if the work is still
active from a previous registration?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1791873876.git.jirislaby@kernel.org?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-14  6:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-13  6:48 [PATCH v2 0/6] serial: 8250: make port operations work on struct uart_8250_port Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2026-10-13  6:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] serial: 8250: drop err label from serial8250_register_8250_port() Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2026-10-14  6:49   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-13  6:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] serial: 8250_exar: remove useless void * casts Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2026-10-14  6:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13  6:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] serial: 8250_exar: store the GPIO platform device in struct exar8250 Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2026-10-14  6:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13  6:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] serial: 8250_lpss: do not touch uninitialized line in ehl_serial_exit() Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2026-10-13 21:13   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-14  6:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13  6:48 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] serial: 8250_omap: set priv->line before enabling the IRQ Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2026-10-14  6:49   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13  6:48 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] serial: 8250: make port operations work on struct uart_8250_port Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2026-10-13  7:33   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-13  7:53     ` Jiri Slaby
2026-10-13  9:09       ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-13  9:39         ` Jiri Slaby
2026-10-13 10:00           ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-13 10:15             ` Jiri Slaby
2026-10-13 10:54               ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-10-13 10:51           ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-10-13 11:06             ` Jiri Slaby
2026-10-13 13:42               ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-14  6:49   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-170892@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox