From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] serial: 8250: drop err label from serial8250_register_8250_port()
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 06:49:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-170892@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <baf799ad88f9ef43093ae96731f48a5e88d726dd.1791873876.git.jirislaby@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] tty: serial: 8250: missing cancel_delayed_work_sync() for overrun_backoff
- [High] tty: serial: 8250: workqueue list corruption via INIT_DELAYED_WORK()
--
commit c4166af59c093eb0e0aed408aac8356ad1cf88f2
Author: Jiri Slaby (SUSE) <jirislaby@kernel.org>
serial: 8250: drop err label from serial8250_register_8250_port()
This commit refactors serial8250_register_8250_port() to eliminate
goto-based error handling while holding a guard() lock. The port
configuration logic is moved into a new helper,
__serial8250_register_8250_port(), which returns an int and uses plain
returns on failures. The caller then handles resetting uart->port.dev in a
single place.
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> index 11424fef7c08b..7ff307ce6aa88 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_core.c
> @@ -743,46 +743,12 @@ static void serial_8250_overrun_backoff_work(struct work_struct *work)
> serial_out(up, UART_IER, up->ier);
> }
[Severity: High]
Can this background work access hardware registers after the port is
unregistered?
When a port is removed (such as during hot-unplug or driver unbind), it
appears there is no matching cancel_delayed_work_sync() for the
overrun_backoff work.
If the device memory is unmapped and the delayed work executes, will this
serial_out() trigger a synchronous external abort or use-after-free?
[ ... ]
> @@ -927,9 +891,51 @@ int serial8250_register_8250_port(const struct uart_8250_port *up)
> }
>
> return ret;
> +}
[Severity: High]
Does this new helper unconditionally re-initialize the delayed work without
checking if it is already pending?
If a device is unbound and then rebound while the overrun_backoff work is
still pending, __serial8250_register_8250_port() is called again. Towards the
end of the helper, the work is initialized:
if (up->overrun_backoff_time_ms > 0) {
...
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&uart->overrun_backoff,
serial_8250_overrun_backoff_work);
}
Re-initializing an active delayed work item with INIT_DELAYED_WORK() calls
INIT_LIST_HEAD() on its list nodes.
Can this corrupt the timer or workqueue linked lists if the work is still
active from a previous registration?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1791873876.git.jirislaby@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 6:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-13 6:48 [PATCH v2 0/6] serial: 8250: make port operations work on struct uart_8250_port Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2026-10-13 6:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] serial: 8250: drop err label from serial8250_register_8250_port() Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2026-10-14 6:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-13 6:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] serial: 8250_exar: remove useless void * casts Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2026-10-14 6:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 6:48 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] serial: 8250_exar: store the GPIO platform device in struct exar8250 Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2026-10-14 6:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 6:48 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] serial: 8250_lpss: do not touch uninitialized line in ehl_serial_exit() Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2026-10-13 21:13 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-14 6:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 6:48 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] serial: 8250_omap: set priv->line before enabling the IRQ Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2026-10-14 6:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-13 6:48 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] serial: 8250: make port operations work on struct uart_8250_port Jiri Slaby (SUSE)
2026-10-13 7:33 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-13 7:53 ` Jiri Slaby
2026-10-13 9:09 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-13 9:39 ` Jiri Slaby
2026-10-13 10:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-13 10:15 ` Jiri Slaby
2026-10-13 10:54 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-10-13 10:51 ` Alejandro Colomar
2026-10-13 11:06 ` Jiri Slaby
2026-10-13 13:42 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-14 6:49 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-170892@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox