* [PATCHv2] x86/sgx: Avoid softlockup from sgx_vepc_release
@ 2023-08-15 18:22 Jack Wang
2023-08-16 10:13 ` Huang, Kai
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jack Wang @ 2023-08-15 18:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sgx; +Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen, Haitao Huang, stable, Yu Zhang
We hit softlocup with following call trace:
? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20
xa_erase+0x21/0xb0
? sgx_free_epc_page+0x20/0x50
sgx_vepc_release+0x75/0x220
__fput+0x89/0x250
task_work_run+0x59/0x90
do_exit+0x337/0x9a0
Similar like commit
8795359e35bc ("x86/sgx: Silence softlockup detection when releasing large enclaves")
The test system has 64GB of enclave memory, and all assigned to a single
VM. Release vepc take longer time and triggers the softlockup warning.
Add a cond_resched() to give other tasks a chance to run and placate
the softlockup detector.
Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Cc: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 540745ddbc70 ("x86/sgx: Introduce virtual EPC for use by KVM guests")
Reported-by: Yu Zhang <yu.zhang@ionos.com>
Tested-by: Yu Zhang <yu.zhang@ionos.com>
Acked-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>
---
v2:
* collects review and test by.
* add fixes tag
* trim call trace.
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c
index c3e37eaec8ec..01d2795792cc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c
@@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ static int sgx_vepc_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
continue;
xa_erase(&vepc->page_array, index);
+ cond_resched();
}
/*
@@ -222,6 +223,7 @@ static int sgx_vepc_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
list_add_tail(&epc_page->list, &secs_pages);
xa_erase(&vepc->page_array, index);
+ cond_resched();
}
/*
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] x86/sgx: Avoid softlockup from sgx_vepc_release
2023-08-15 18:22 [PATCHv2] x86/sgx: Avoid softlockup from sgx_vepc_release Jack Wang
@ 2023-08-16 10:13 ` Huang, Kai
2023-08-17 7:53 ` Jinpu Wang
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Huang, Kai @ 2023-08-16 10:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, jinpu.wang@ionos.com
Cc: yu.zhang@ionos.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, jarkko@kernel.org,
haitao.huang@linux.intel.com
On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 20:22 +0200, Jack Wang wrote:
> We hit softlocup with following call trace:
Please add an empty line for better readability.
> ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20
> xa_erase+0x21/0xb0
> ? sgx_free_epc_page+0x20/0x50
> sgx_vepc_release+0x75/0x220
> __fput+0x89/0x250
> task_work_run+0x59/0x90
> do_exit+0x337/0x9a0
>
> Similar like commit
> 8795359e35bc ("x86/sgx: Silence softlockup detection when releasing large enclaves")
Please wrap text properly.
> The test system has 64GB of enclave memory, and all assigned to a single
> VM. Release vepc take longer time and triggers the softlockup warning.
>
> Add a cond_resched() to give other tasks a chance to run and placate
^
You are adding more than one 'cond_resched()', so remove 'a'.
> the softlockup detector.
>
> Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> Cc: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 540745ddbc70 ("x86/sgx: Introduce virtual EPC for use by KVM guests")
> Reported-by: Yu Zhang <yu.zhang@ionos.com>
> Tested-by: Yu Zhang <yu.zhang@ionos.com>
> Acked-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>
> ---
> v2:
> * collects review and test by.
> * add fixes tag
> * trim call trace.
>
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c
> index c3e37eaec8ec..01d2795792cc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c
> @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ static int sgx_vepc_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> continue;
>
> xa_erase(&vepc->page_array, index);
> + cond_resched();
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -222,6 +223,7 @@ static int sgx_vepc_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> list_add_tail(&epc_page->list, &secs_pages);
>
> xa_erase(&vepc->page_array, index);
> + cond_resched();
> }
>
>
Comments ignored without explanation:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/op.19p011pawjvjmi@hhuan26-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com/T/#mf004deb81f9eb1eab7ad3c1c88746bfa23d5109c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] x86/sgx: Avoid softlockup from sgx_vepc_release
2023-08-16 10:13 ` Huang, Kai
@ 2023-08-17 7:53 ` Jinpu Wang
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jinpu Wang @ 2023-08-17 7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Huang, Kai
Cc: linux-sgx@vger.kernel.org, yu.zhang@ionos.com,
stable@vger.kernel.org, jarkko@kernel.org,
haitao.huang@linux.intel.com
On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 12:13 PM Huang, Kai <kai.huang@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-08-15 at 20:22 +0200, Jack Wang wrote:
> > We hit softlocup with following call trace:
>
> Please add an empty line for better readability.
>
> > ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20
> > xa_erase+0x21/0xb0
> > ? sgx_free_epc_page+0x20/0x50
> > sgx_vepc_release+0x75/0x220
> > __fput+0x89/0x250
> > task_work_run+0x59/0x90
> > do_exit+0x337/0x9a0
> >
> > Similar like commit
> > 8795359e35bc ("x86/sgx: Silence softlockup detection when releasing large enclaves")
>
> Please wrap text properly.
>
> > The test system has 64GB of enclave memory, and all assigned to a single
> > VM. Release vepc take longer time and triggers the softlockup warning.
> >
> > Add a cond_resched() to give other tasks a chance to run and placate
> ^
>
> You are adding more than one 'cond_resched()', so remove 'a'.
>
> > the softlockup detector.
Hi Kai,
Thx for the comments, sorry for slow reply. was busy with other high
prio tasks. I've answered your initial input in v1 patch.
I will wait a bit see if there is other comments, maybe the maintainer
want to fix them while apply
Thx!
> >
> > Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Fixes: 540745ddbc70 ("x86/sgx: Introduce virtual EPC for use by KVM guests")
> > Reported-by: Yu Zhang <yu.zhang@ionos.com>
> > Tested-by: Yu Zhang <yu.zhang@ionos.com>
> > Acked-by: Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@ionos.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > * collects review and test by.
> > * add fixes tag
> > * trim call trace.
> >
> > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c
> > index c3e37eaec8ec..01d2795792cc 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/sgx/virt.c
> > @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ static int sgx_vepc_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > continue;
> >
> > xa_erase(&vepc->page_array, index);
> > + cond_resched();
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -222,6 +223,7 @@ static int sgx_vepc_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
> > list_add_tail(&epc_page->list, &secs_pages);
> >
> > xa_erase(&vepc->page_array, index);
> > + cond_resched();
> > }
> >
> >
>
> Comments ignored without explanation:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sgx/op.19p011pawjvjmi@hhuan26-mobl.amr.corp.intel.com/T/#mf004deb81f9eb1eab7ad3c1c88746bfa23d5109c
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-08-17 7:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-08-15 18:22 [PATCHv2] x86/sgx: Avoid softlockup from sgx_vepc_release Jack Wang
2023-08-16 10:13 ` Huang, Kai
2023-08-17 7:53 ` Jinpu Wang
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox