SUPERH platform development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] ARM: gpio: davinci: convert drivers to use
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 19:45:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110809194553.GA14281@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E4122B6.2070706@ru.mvista.com>

On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 04:06:14PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 09-08-2011 12:06, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>
>    CCing linux-usb and Felipe...
>
>> Signed-off-by: Russell King<rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
>> ---
>>   drivers/usb/musb/davinci.c |    2 +-
>>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/musb/davinci.c b/drivers/usb/musb/davinci.c
>> index 8bdf25a..f9a3f62 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/musb/davinci.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/musb/davinci.c
>> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
>>
>>   #include<mach/hardware.h>
>>   #include<mach/memory.h>
>> -#include<mach/gpio.h>
>> +#include<asm/gpio.h>
>
>    Shouldn't this now be moved to the below #include group?

When doing this kind of work with sed -i, that doesn't happen.  There's
too much of this crap (and I've been telling people about this for at
least a year) that I don't think there's that luxury anymore.

If maintainers would have paid more attention, then most of these changes
would not be necessary.  My view is that if maintainers do care about this
stuff _they_ should have been the ones to pick up on it long ago.  In
other words, they've lost the right to complain about petty crap like
the ordering of includes through their own inaction on this point.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-09 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-09  8:04 [PATCH 00/13] Clean up mach/gpio.h headers Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-09  8:04 ` [PATCH 01/13] ARM: gpio: at91: remove redundant include of Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-09  8:05 ` [PATCH 02/13] ARM: gpio: convert includes of mach/gpio.h and Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-09  8:05 ` [PATCH 03/13] ARM: gpio: omap: convert drivers to use asm/gpio.h Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-29 18:20   ` [PATCH 03/13] ARM: gpio: omap: convert drivers to use asm/gpio.h rather than mach/gpio.h Kevin Hilman
2011-08-09  8:05 ` [PATCH 04/13] ARM: gpio: at91: convert drivers to use asm/gpio.h Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-09  8:06 ` [PATCH 05/13] ARM: gpio: nomadik: " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-09  8:06 ` [PATCH 06/13] ARM: gpio: davinci: " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-09 12:06   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2011-08-09 19:45     ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2011-08-09  8:06 ` [PATCH 07/13] ARM: gpio: pnx4008: " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-09  8:07 ` [PATCH 08/13] ARM: gpio: ixp2000: " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-09  8:07 ` [PATCH 09/13] ARM: gpio: tegra: " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-09  8:07 ` [PATCH 10/13] ARM: gpio: pxa: " Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-09  8:08 ` [PATCH 11/13] ARM: gpio: consolidate trivial gpiolib implementations Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-09 17:02   ` [PATCH 11/13] ARM: gpio: consolidate trivial gpiolib H Hartley Sweeten
2011-08-09 17:59   ` David Brown
2011-08-10  7:54   ` [PATCH 11/13] ARM: gpio: consolidate trivial gpiolib implementations Linus Walleij
2011-08-11 11:47   ` [PATCH 11/13] ARM: gpio: consolidate trivial gpiolib Kukjin Kim
2011-08-11 15:08     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-11 16:24       ` David Brown
2011-08-11 14:15   ` Felipe Balbi
2011-08-11 15:07     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-11 18:50       ` Felipe Balbi
2011-08-12  5:54   ` Shawn Guo
2011-08-29 18:23   ` [PATCH 11/13] ARM: gpio: consolidate trivial gpiolib implementations Kevin Hilman
2011-08-09  8:08 ` [PATCH 12/13] ARM: gpio: consolidate gpio_to_irq Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-11 11:58   ` Kukjin Kim
2011-08-09  8:08 ` [PATCH 13/13] ARM: gpio: make trivial GPIOLIB implementation the Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-09 17:04   ` [PATCH 13/13] ARM: gpio: make trivial GPIOLIB implementation H Hartley Sweeten
2011-08-11 12:02   ` [PATCH 13/13] ARM: gpio: make trivial GPIOLIB implementation the Kukjin Kim
2011-08-09  9:58 ` [PATCH 00/13] Clean up mach/gpio.h headers Jamie Iles
2011-08-09 21:00 ` Grant Likely
2011-08-09 21:32   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-09 21:50     ` Grant Likely

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110809194553.GA14281@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox