From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] on sh7372 (mackerel) with today's Linus' (github) master
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2011 13:07:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201109241507.07990.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1109231012490.25166@axis700.grange>
On Saturday, September 24, 2011, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:58:37AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Well, since nobody seems to execute anything that may sleep under
> > clocks_mutex, perhaps we can do something like this:
>
> No - a spinlock prevents preemption, a mutex does not.
>
> It's runtime PM which is doing stuff wrong here. You're not supposed to
> give up the clk struct with it enabled.
OK, so below is a fix confined to clock_ops.c.
Thanks,
Rafael
---
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Subject: PM / Clocks: Do not acquire a mutex under a spinlock
Commit b7ab83e (PM: Use spinlock instead of mutex in clock
management functions) introduced a regression causing clocks_mutex
to be acquired under a spinlock. This happens because
pm_clk_suspend() and pm_clk_resume() call pm_clk_acquire() under
pcd->lock, but pm_clk_acquire() executes clk_get() which causes
clocks_mutex to be acquired. Similarly, __pm_clk_remove(),
executed under pcd->lock, calls clk_put(), which also causes
clocks_mutex to be acquired.
To fix those problems make pm_clk_add() call pm_clk_acquire(), so
that pm_clk_suspend() and pm_clk_resume() don't have to do that.
Change pm_clk_remove() and pm_clk_destroy() to separate
modifications of the pcd->clock_list list from the actual removal of
PM clock entry objects done by __pm_clk_remove().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
Index: linux/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
=================================--- linux.orig/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
+++ linux/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
@@ -42,6 +42,22 @@ static struct pm_clk_data *__to_pcd(stru
}
/**
+ * pm_clk_acquire - Acquire a device clock.
+ * @dev: Device whose clock is to be acquired.
+ * @ce: PM clock entry corresponding to the clock.
+ */
+static void pm_clk_acquire(struct device *dev, struct pm_clock_entry *ce)
+{
+ ce->clk = clk_get(dev, ce->con_id);
+ if (IS_ERR(ce->clk)) {
+ ce->status = PCE_STATUS_ERROR;
+ } else {
+ ce->status = PCE_STATUS_ACQUIRED;
+ dev_dbg(dev, "Clock %s managed by runtime PM.\n", ce->con_id);
+ }
+}
+
+/**
* pm_clk_add - Start using a device clock for power management.
* @dev: Device whose clock is going to be used for power management.
* @con_id: Connection ID of the clock.
@@ -73,6 +89,8 @@ int pm_clk_add(struct device *dev, const
}
}
+ pm_clk_acquire(dev, ce);
+
spin_lock_irq(&pcd->lock);
list_add_tail(&ce->node, &pcd->clock_list);
spin_unlock_irq(&pcd->lock);
@@ -82,17 +100,12 @@ int pm_clk_add(struct device *dev, const
/**
* __pm_clk_remove - Destroy PM clock entry.
* @ce: PM clock entry to destroy.
- *
- * This routine must be called under the spinlock protecting the PM list of
- * clocks corresponding the the @ce's device.
*/
static void __pm_clk_remove(struct pm_clock_entry *ce)
{
if (!ce)
return;
- list_del(&ce->node);
-
if (ce->status < PCE_STATUS_ERROR) {
if (ce->status = PCE_STATUS_ENABLED)
clk_disable(ce->clk);
@@ -126,18 +139,22 @@ void pm_clk_remove(struct device *dev, c
spin_lock_irq(&pcd->lock);
list_for_each_entry(ce, &pcd->clock_list, node) {
- if (!con_id && !ce->con_id) {
- __pm_clk_remove(ce);
- break;
- } else if (!con_id || !ce->con_id) {
+ if (!con_id && !ce->con_id)
+ goto remove;
+ else if (!con_id || !ce->con_id)
continue;
- } else if (!strcmp(con_id, ce->con_id)) {
- __pm_clk_remove(ce);
- break;
- }
+ else if (!strcmp(con_id, ce->con_id))
+ goto remove;
}
spin_unlock_irq(&pcd->lock);
+ return;
+
+ remove:
+ list_del(&ce->node);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&pcd->lock);
+
+ __pm_clk_remove(ce);
}
/**
@@ -175,20 +192,27 @@ void pm_clk_destroy(struct device *dev)
{
struct pm_clk_data *pcd = __to_pcd(dev);
struct pm_clock_entry *ce, *c;
+ struct list_head list;
if (!pcd)
return;
dev->power.subsys_data = NULL;
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&list);
spin_lock_irq(&pcd->lock);
list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(ce, c, &pcd->clock_list, node)
- __pm_clk_remove(ce);
+ list_move(&ce->node, &list);
spin_unlock_irq(&pcd->lock);
kfree(pcd);
+
+ list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse(ce, c, &list, node) {
+ list_del(&ce->node);
+ __pm_clk_remove(ce);
+ }
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PM */
@@ -196,23 +220,6 @@ void pm_clk_destroy(struct device *dev)
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
/**
- * pm_clk_acquire - Acquire a device clock.
- * @dev: Device whose clock is to be acquired.
- * @con_id: Connection ID of the clock.
- */
-static void pm_clk_acquire(struct device *dev,
- struct pm_clock_entry *ce)
-{
- ce->clk = clk_get(dev, ce->con_id);
- if (IS_ERR(ce->clk)) {
- ce->status = PCE_STATUS_ERROR;
- } else {
- ce->status = PCE_STATUS_ACQUIRED;
- dev_dbg(dev, "Clock %s managed by runtime PM.\n", ce->con_id);
- }
-}
-
-/**
* pm_clk_suspend - Disable clocks in a device's PM clock list.
* @dev: Device to disable the clocks for.
*/
@@ -230,9 +237,6 @@ int pm_clk_suspend(struct device *dev)
spin_lock_irqsave(&pcd->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry_reverse(ce, &pcd->clock_list, node) {
- if (ce->status = PCE_STATUS_NONE)
- pm_clk_acquire(dev, ce);
-
if (ce->status < PCE_STATUS_ERROR) {
clk_disable(ce->clk);
ce->status = PCE_STATUS_ACQUIRED;
@@ -262,9 +266,6 @@ int pm_clk_resume(struct device *dev)
spin_lock_irqsave(&pcd->lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(ce, &pcd->clock_list, node) {
- if (ce->status = PCE_STATUS_NONE)
- pm_clk_acquire(dev, ce);
-
if (ce->status < PCE_STATUS_ERROR) {
clk_enable(ce->clk);
ce->status = PCE_STATUS_ENABLED;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-24 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-23 8:17 [BUG] on sh7372 (mackerel) with today's Linus' (github) master Guennadi Liakhovetski
2011-09-23 22:21 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-23 22:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-09-24 8:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-24 13:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-09-26 8:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-09-26 17:25 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201109241507.07990.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox