From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>, Rafael <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Magnus <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Linux-SH <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] driver core: fixup reversed deferred probe order
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 00:33:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120613003346.GB5321@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874nqg84do.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 05:03:38PM -0700, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>
> Hi Greg
>
> Thank you for checking this patch
>
> > > If driver requests probe deferral,
> > > it will be added to deferred_probe_pending_list
> > > by driver_deferred_probe_add(), but, it used list_add().
> > > Because of that, deferred probe will be run as reversed order.
> > > This patch uses list_add_tail(), and solved this issue.
> >
> > Is this causing a problem with 3.5-rc2 on some systems, so it needs to
> > get into 3.5-final, or can it wait for 3.6?
>
> ALSA SoC sound card detection order was broken by this issue in v3.5-rcX
> (on some board).
> So, I'm happy if it was included in v3.5-final.
Ok, thanks for letting me know, will queue it up for that release.
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-13 0:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-29 6:38 [PATCH] ARM: mach-shmobile: tidyup: sound card detection order Kuninori Morimoto
2012-05-29 6:46 ` Simon Horman
2012-05-29 7:04 ` Paul Mundt
2012-05-29 7:33 ` Simon Horman
2012-05-29 7:40 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2012-05-29 9:11 ` Simon Horman
2012-05-30 0:25 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2012-05-30 1:09 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2012-05-30 1:30 ` Simon Horman
2012-05-30 1:34 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2012-05-30 1:46 ` [PATCH] driver core: fixup reversed deferred probe order Kuninori Morimoto
2012-06-12 23:17 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-13 0:03 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2012-06-13 0:33 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2012-07-09 21:56 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120613003346.GB5321@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@gmail.com \
--cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox