* Re: [PATCH 00/02] ARM: shmobile: r8a7793 GOSE board HDMI prototype
2015-11-16 9:15 [PATCH 00/02] ARM: shmobile: r8a7793 GOSE board HDMI prototype Magnus Damm
@ 2015-11-24 2:53 ` Simon Horman
2015-11-24 3:05 ` Magnus Damm
2015-11-25 0:13 ` Simon Horman
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2015-11-24 2:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
Hi Magnus,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:15:15PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> ARM: shmobile: r8a7793 GOSE board HDMI prototype
>
> [PATCH 01/02] ARM: shmobile: r8a7793: Add DU node to device tree
> [PATCH 02/02] ARM: shmobile: r8a7793: gose: HDMI prototype hack
>
> These patches include HDMI prototype support for the r8a7793 GOSE board.
> No special merge time dependencies exist, however for correct run time
> operation v4.4-rc1 is recommended and in particular the patch
> "drm: rcar-du: Add support for the R8A7793 DU".
>
> Tested with the modetest utility on the r8a7793 GOSE board.
> # modetest -M rcar-du -c
> # modetest -M rcar-du -s 33:1280x720@AR24
>
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@opensource.se>
It would help me somewhat if you could prefix prototype patches with
RFC or PATCH/RFC. Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/02] ARM: shmobile: r8a7793 GOSE board HDMI prototype
2015-11-16 9:15 [PATCH 00/02] ARM: shmobile: r8a7793 GOSE board HDMI prototype Magnus Damm
2015-11-24 2:53 ` Simon Horman
@ 2015-11-24 3:05 ` Magnus Damm
2015-11-25 0:13 ` Simon Horman
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Magnus Damm @ 2015-11-24 3:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
Hi Simon,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> Hi Magnus,
>
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:15:15PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
>> ARM: shmobile: r8a7793 GOSE board HDMI prototype
>>
>> [PATCH 01/02] ARM: shmobile: r8a7793: Add DU node to device tree
>> [PATCH 02/02] ARM: shmobile: r8a7793: gose: HDMI prototype hack
>>
>> These patches include HDMI prototype support for the r8a7793 GOSE board.
>> No special merge time dependencies exist, however for correct run time
>> operation v4.4-rc1 is recommended and in particular the patch
>> "drm: rcar-du: Add support for the R8A7793 DU".
>>
>> Tested with the modetest utility on the r8a7793 GOSE board.
>> # modetest -M rcar-du -c
>> # modetest -M rcar-du -s 33:1280x720@AR24
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@opensource.se>
>
> It would help me somewhat if you could prefix prototype patches with
> RFC or PATCH/RFC. Thanks.
Yeah, I agree - sorry for constantly forgetting about the RFC portion.
This particular series actually had the first patch as "ready to merge
upstream" while the second one is a prototype that depends on I2C
which I think is missing for r8a7793.
Would it be possible for you to pick up the first patch and prioritise
I2C over other devices on r8a7793? That way I can easily redo patch
2/2 and we get working HDMI upstream.
Thanks,
/ magnus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/02] ARM: shmobile: r8a7793 GOSE board HDMI prototype
2015-11-16 9:15 [PATCH 00/02] ARM: shmobile: r8a7793 GOSE board HDMI prototype Magnus Damm
2015-11-24 2:53 ` Simon Horman
2015-11-24 3:05 ` Magnus Damm
@ 2015-11-25 0:13 ` Simon Horman
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2015-11-25 0:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-sh
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 12:05:30PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:53 AM, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> wrote:
> > Hi Magnus,
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 06:15:15PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> >> ARM: shmobile: r8a7793 GOSE board HDMI prototype
> >>
> >> [PATCH 01/02] ARM: shmobile: r8a7793: Add DU node to device tree
> >> [PATCH 02/02] ARM: shmobile: r8a7793: gose: HDMI prototype hack
> >>
> >> These patches include HDMI prototype support for the r8a7793 GOSE board.
> >> No special merge time dependencies exist, however for correct run time
> >> operation v4.4-rc1 is recommended and in particular the patch
> >> "drm: rcar-du: Add support for the R8A7793 DU".
> >>
> >> Tested with the modetest utility on the r8a7793 GOSE board.
> >> # modetest -M rcar-du -c
> >> # modetest -M rcar-du -s 33:1280x720@AR24
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@opensource.se>
> >
> > It would help me somewhat if you could prefix prototype patches with
> > RFC or PATCH/RFC. Thanks.
>
> Yeah, I agree - sorry for constantly forgetting about the RFC portion.
>
> This particular series actually had the first patch as "ready to merge
> upstream" while the second one is a prototype that depends on I2C
> which I think is missing for r8a7793.
>
> Would it be possible for you to pick up the first patch and prioritise
> I2C over other devices on r8a7793? That way I can easily redo patch
> 2/2 and we get working HDMI upstream.
Sure, I'll look at queuing up patch 1/2.
However, a scheme where a series labeled prototype contains a patch ready
to merge and one not ready to merge is a little hard for me to follow.
I know its tedious but it would help in future if RFC and ready-to-merge
patches were in separate series and RFC were tags used. Thanks :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread