SUPERH platform development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: shmobile: r8a7779: Wait for status on selected MSTP clocks
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 08:26:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9488859.oh59qfV17n@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1384357973-27365-3-git-send-email-laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>

Hi Morimoto-san,

On Wednesday 20 November 2013 18:07:24 Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> Hi Laurent
> 
> > From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> > 
> > When enabling some of the module clocks by clearing stop bits in the
> > MSTP control registers, the CPG requires waiting for the status
> > registers to signal that the clocks have started. Failure to do so will
> > result in returning from the clk_enable() call with the clock
> > potentially still disabled, leading to various race conditions and
> > difficult to debug errors.
> > 
> > Enable status wait for all the r8a7779 MSTP clocks that report their
> > status.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7779.c | 26 ++++++++++----------------
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7779.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7779.c index b7ce0e7..1955738 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7779.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/clock-r8a7779.c
> > @@ -52,12 +52,6 @@
> > 
> >  #define MSTPCR1		IOMEM(0xffc80034)
> >  #define MSTPCR3		IOMEM(0xffc8003c)
> >  #define MSTPSR1		IOMEM(0xffc80044)
> > 
> > -#define MSTPSR4		IOMEM(0xffc80048)
> > -#define MSTPSR6		IOMEM(0xffc8004c)
> > -#define MSTPCR4		IOMEM(0xffc80050)
> > -#define MSTPCR5		IOMEM(0xffc80054)
> > -#define MSTPCR6		IOMEM(0xffc80058)
> > -#define MSTPCR7		IOMEM(0xffc80040)
> 
> Why do you remove these MSTPCRx in this patch ?
> It is out-of this purpose

I've removed them as they're unused. This could be split to a separate patch 
if preferred, I've just thought it would be overkill.

> >  #define MODEMR		0xffcc0020
> > 
> > @@ -127,16 +121,16 @@ static struct clk mstp_clks[MSTP_NR] = {
> > 
> >  	[MSTP322] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR3, 22, 0), /* SDHI1 */
> >  	[MSTP321] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR3, 21, 0), /* SDHI2 */
> >  	[MSTP320] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR3, 20, 0), /* SDHI3 */
> > 
> > -	[MSTP120] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1, 20, 0), /* VIN3 */
> > -	[MSTP116] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1, 16, 0), /* PCIe */
> > -	[MSTP115] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1, 15, 0), /* SATA */
> > -	[MSTP114] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1, 14, 0), /* Ether */
> > -	[MSTP110] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1, 10, 0), /* VIN0 */
> > -	[MSTP109] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1,  9, 0), /* VIN1 */
> > -	[MSTP108] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1,  8, 0), /* VIN2 */
> > -	[MSTP103] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1,  3, 0), /* DU */
> > -	[MSTP101] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1,  1, 0), /* USB2 */
> > -	[MSTP100] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1,  0, 0), /* USB0/1 */
> > +	[MSTP120] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1, 20, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > VIN3 */
> > +	[MSTP116] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1, 16, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > PCIe */
> > +	[MSTP115] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1, 15, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > SATA */
> > +	[MSTP114] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1, 14, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > Ether */
> > +	[MSTP110] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1, 10, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > VIN0 */
> > +	[MSTP109] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1,  9, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > VIN1 */
> > +	[MSTP108] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1,  8, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > VIN2 */
> > +	[MSTP103] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clks_clk, MSTPCR1,  3, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > DU */
> > +	[MSTP101] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1,  1, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > USB2 */
> > +	[MSTP100] = SH_CLK_MSTP32_STS(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR1,  0, MSTPSR1, 0), /*
> > USB0/1 */> 
> >  	[MSTP030] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR0, 30, 0), /* I2C0 */
> >  	[MSTP029] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR0, 29, 0), /* I2C1 */
> >  	[MSTP028] = SH_CLK_MSTP32(&clkp_clk, MSTPCR0, 28, 0), /* I2C2 */

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-11-21  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-11-13 15:52 [PATCH v2 2/3] ARM: shmobile: r8a7779: Wait for status on selected MSTP clocks Laurent Pinchart
2013-11-21  2:07 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-11-21  8:26 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2013-11-25  0:05 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-11-25  0:08 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-11-25  0:23 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2013-11-25  3:36 ` Simon Horman
2013-11-25 14:19 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-11-26  0:26 ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9488859.oh59qfV17n@avalon \
    --to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox