From: Simon Trimmer <simont@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: 'Richard Fitzgerald' <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>,
'Mark Brown' <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-sound@vger.kernel.org>, <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <patches@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:48:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <007b01dac0c5$7807ac30$68170490$@opensource.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3451fcf6-ff33-4f72-83d1-945b026b925b@opensource.cirrus.com>
> From: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2024 3:34 PM
> On 17/06/2024 15:04, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 02:53:38PM +0100, Simon Trimmer wrote:
> >> IRQ lookup functions such as those in ACPI can return error values when
> >> an IRQ is not defined. The i2c core driver converts the error codes to
a
> >> value of 0 and the SPI bus driver passes them unaltered to client
device
> >> drivers.
> >>
> >> The cs35l56 driver should only accept positive non-zero values as IRQ
> >> numbers.
> >
> > Have all architectures removed 0 as a valid IRQ?
>
> From discussion threads we can find 0 might still used on x86 for a
> legacy device.
> But the conversations we can find on this don't seem to exclude passing
> a negative error number, just that 0 can normally be assumed invalid.
>
> The kerneldoc for SPI says:
>
> * @irq: Negative, or the number passed to request_irq() to receive
> * interrupts from this device.
Yes and the threads of these lore links in these commits are rather feisty
ce753ad1549c platform: finally disallow IRQ0 in platform_get_irq() and its
ilk
a85a6c86c25b driver core: platform: Clarify that IRQ 0 is invalid
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-17 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-17 13:53 [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Accept values greater than 0 as IRQ numbers Simon Trimmer
2024-06-17 14:04 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-17 14:33 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2024-06-17 14:48 ` Simon Trimmer [this message]
2024-06-17 14:54 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2024-06-18 16:00 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-18 16:06 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2024-06-18 15:58 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-18 16:07 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2024-06-19 9:44 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2024-06-19 10:22 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-19 10:24 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2024-06-19 11:48 ` Mark Brown
2024-06-19 13:50 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='007b01dac0c5$7807ac30$68170490$@opensource.cirrus.com' \
--to=simont@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox