[PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Intel: pci-tgl: Align ADL-N sof_dev_desc struct name to convention

[PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Intel: pci-tgl: Align ADL-N sof_dev_desc struct name to convention

[Peter Ujfalusi]

Follow the convention already in use by other platforms on naming the
sof_dev_desc struct by dropping the underscore between adl and n

Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
---
 sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-tgl.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-tgl.c b/sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-tgl.c
index ebe1a7d16689..01db2e720b44 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-tgl.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/intel/pci-tgl.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static const struct sof_dev_desc adl_desc = {
 	.ops_free = hda_ops_free,
 };
 
-static const struct sof_dev_desc adl_n_desc = {
+static const struct sof_dev_desc adln_desc = {
 	.machines               = snd_soc_acpi_intel_adl_machines,
 	.alt_machines           = snd_soc_acpi_intel_adl_sdw_machines,
 	.use_acpi_target_states = true,
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static const struct pci_device_id sof_pci_ids[] = {
 	{ PCI_DEVICE_DATA(INTEL, HDA_ADL_PX, &adl_desc) },
 	{ PCI_DEVICE_DATA(INTEL, HDA_RPL_M, &rpl_desc) },
 	{ PCI_DEVICE_DATA(INTEL, HDA_RPL_PX, &rpl_desc) },
-	{ PCI_DEVICE_DATA(INTEL, HDA_ADL_N, &adl_n_desc) },
+	{ PCI_DEVICE_DATA(INTEL, HDA_ADL_N, &adln_desc) },
 	{ 0, }
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, sof_pci_ids);
-- 
2.45.1

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: Intel: pci-tgl: Align ADL-N sof_dev_desc struct name to convention

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 10:25:44 +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Follow the convention already in use by other platforms on naming the
> sof_dev_desc struct by dropping the underscore between adl and n
> 
> 

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: SOF: Intel: pci-tgl: Align ADL-N sof_dev_desc struct name to convention
      commit: ccdc13ab26ca248fdc53179a0c7f588ab2e1c8d8

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark