[PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Patch CS35L56_IRQ1_MASK_18 to the default value

[PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Patch CS35L56_IRQ1_MASK_18 to the default value

[Simon Trimmer]

Device tuning files made with early revision tooling may contain
configuration that can unmask IRQ signals that are owned by the host.

Adding a safe default to the regmap patch ensures that the hardware
matches the driver expectations.

Signed-off-by: Simon Trimmer <simont@opensource.cirrus.com>
---
 sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56-shared.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56-shared.c b/sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56-shared.c
index e7e8d617da94..bd74fef33d49 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56-shared.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56-shared.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ static const struct reg_sequence cs35l56_patch[] = {
 	{ CS35L56_SWIRE_DP3_CH2_INPUT,		0x00000019 },
 	{ CS35L56_SWIRE_DP3_CH3_INPUT,		0x00000029 },
 	{ CS35L56_SWIRE_DP3_CH4_INPUT,		0x00000028 },
+	{ CS35L56_IRQ1_MASK_18,			0x1f7df0ff },
 
 	/* These are not reset by a soft-reset, so patch to defaults. */
 	{ CS35L56_MAIN_RENDER_USER_MUTE,	0x00000000 },
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH] ASoC: cs35l56: Patch CS35L56_IRQ1_MASK_18 to the default value

[Mark Brown]

On Wed, 07 Aug 2024 14:26:48 +0000, Simon Trimmer wrote:
> Device tuning files made with early revision tooling may contain
> configuration that can unmask IRQ signals that are owned by the host.
> 
> Adding a safe default to the regmap patch ensures that the hardware
> matches the driver expectations.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: cs35l56: Patch CS35L56_IRQ1_MASK_18 to the default value
      commit: 72776774b55bb59b7b1b09117e915a5030110304

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark