From: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
To: peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org
Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com,
jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 6/7] ASoC: ti: omap-mcbsp-st: Use guard() for spin locks
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 17:38:36 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260508103837.138142-7-phucduc.bui@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508103837.138142-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
From: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Clean up the code using guard() for spin locks.
Merely code refactoring, and no behavior change.
Signed-off-by: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
---
sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp-st.c | 26 ++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp-st.c b/sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp-st.c
index 901578896ef3..b762d5d3e33b 100644
--- a/sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp-st.c
+++ b/sound/soc/ti/omap-mcbsp-st.c
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static int omap_mcbsp_st_set_chgain(struct omap_mcbsp *mcbsp, int channel,
if (!st_data)
return -ENOENT;
- spin_lock_irq(&mcbsp->lock);
+ guard(spinlock_irq)(&mcbsp->lock);
if (channel == 0)
st_data->ch0gain = chgain;
else if (channel == 1)
@@ -166,7 +166,6 @@ static int omap_mcbsp_st_set_chgain(struct omap_mcbsp *mcbsp, int channel,
if (st_data->enabled)
omap_mcbsp_st_chgain(mcbsp);
- spin_unlock_irq(&mcbsp->lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -180,14 +179,13 @@ static int omap_mcbsp_st_get_chgain(struct omap_mcbsp *mcbsp, int channel,
if (!st_data)
return -ENOENT;
- spin_lock_irq(&mcbsp->lock);
+ guard(spinlock_irq)(&mcbsp->lock);
if (channel == 0)
*chgain = st_data->ch0gain;
else if (channel == 1)
*chgain = st_data->ch1gain;
else
ret = -EINVAL;
- spin_unlock_irq(&mcbsp->lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -199,10 +197,9 @@ static int omap_mcbsp_st_enable(struct omap_mcbsp *mcbsp)
if (!st_data)
return -ENODEV;
- spin_lock_irq(&mcbsp->lock);
+ guard(spinlock_irq)(&mcbsp->lock);
st_data->enabled = 1;
omap_mcbsp_st_start(mcbsp);
- spin_unlock_irq(&mcbsp->lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -215,10 +212,9 @@ static int omap_mcbsp_st_disable(struct omap_mcbsp *mcbsp)
if (!st_data)
return -ENODEV;
- spin_lock_irq(&mcbsp->lock);
+ guard(spinlock_irq)(&mcbsp->lock);
omap_mcbsp_st_stop(mcbsp);
st_data->enabled = 0;
- spin_unlock_irq(&mcbsp->lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -241,13 +237,12 @@ static ssize_t st_taps_show(struct device *dev,
ssize_t status = 0;
int i;
- spin_lock_irq(&mcbsp->lock);
+ guard(spinlock_irq)(&mcbsp->lock);
for (i = 0; i < st_data->nr_taps; i++)
status += sysfs_emit_at(buf, status, (i ? ", %d" : "%d"),
st_data->taps[i]);
if (i)
status += sysfs_emit_at(buf, status, "\n");
- spin_unlock_irq(&mcbsp->lock);
return status;
}
@@ -260,19 +255,17 @@ static ssize_t st_taps_store(struct device *dev,
struct omap_mcbsp_st_data *st_data = mcbsp->st_data;
int val, tmp, status, i = 0;
- spin_lock_irq(&mcbsp->lock);
+ guard(spinlock_irq)(&mcbsp->lock);
memset(st_data->taps, 0, sizeof(st_data->taps));
st_data->nr_taps = 0;
do {
status = sscanf(buf, "%d%n", &val, &tmp);
if (status < 0 || status == 0) {
- size = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
+ return -EINVAL;
}
if (val < -32768 || val > 32767) {
- size = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
+ return -EINVAL;
}
st_data->taps[i++] = val;
buf += tmp;
@@ -283,9 +276,6 @@ static ssize_t st_taps_store(struct device *dev,
st_data->nr_taps = i;
-out:
- spin_unlock_irq(&mcbsp->lock);
-
return size;
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-08 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-08 10:38 [PATCH 0/7] ASoC: ti: Cleanup locking code using guard() helpers phucduc.bui
2026-05-08 10:38 ` [PATCH 1/7] ASoC: ti: j721e-evm: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-05-08 10:38 ` [PATCH 2/7] ASoC: ti: omap-dmic: " phucduc.bui
2026-05-08 10:38 ` [PATCH 3/7] ASoC: ti: omap-hdmi: " phucduc.bui
2026-05-08 10:38 ` [PATCH 4/7] ASoC: ti: omap-mcpdm: " phucduc.bui
2026-05-08 10:38 ` [PATCH 5/7] ASoC: ti: ams-delta: Use guard() for spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-05-08 10:38 ` phucduc.bui [this message]
2026-05-09 12:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] ASoC: ti: omap-mcbsp-st: " Jarkko Nikula
2026-05-08 10:38 ` [PATCH 7/7] ASoC: ti: omap-mcbsp: Simplify lock and resource handling phucduc.bui
2026-05-10 1:35 ` Mark Brown
2026-05-11 4:44 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-05-09 12:28 ` [PATCH 0/7] ASoC: ti: Cleanup locking code using guard() helpers Jarkko Nikula
2026-05-11 0:58 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260508103837.138142-7-phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--to=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@gmail.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox