From: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev>,
linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 20/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst_ipc: Use guard() for spin locks
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:59:01 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611115901.80438-21-phucduc.bui@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611115901.80438-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
From: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Clean up the code using guard() for spin locks.
Merely code refactoring, and no behavior change.
Signed-off-by: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
---
sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_ipc.c | 9 +++------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_ipc.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_ipc.c
index 0d5e71e8a5b5..580678c89b28 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_ipc.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_ipc.c
@@ -38,9 +38,8 @@ struct sst_block *sst_create_block(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx,
msg->on = true;
msg->msg_id = msg_id;
msg->drv_id = drv_id;
- spin_lock_bh(&ctx->block_lock);
- list_add_tail(&msg->node, &ctx->block_list);
- spin_unlock_bh(&ctx->block_lock);
+ scoped_guard(spinlock_bh, &ctx->block_lock)
+ list_add_tail(&msg->node, &ctx->block_list);
return msg;
}
@@ -180,9 +179,8 @@ void intel_sst_clear_intr_mrfld(struct intel_sst_drv *sst_drv_ctx)
union interrupt_reg_mrfld isr;
union interrupt_reg_mrfld imr;
union ipc_header_mrfld clear_ipc;
- unsigned long irq_flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&sst_drv_ctx->ipc_spin_lock, irq_flags);
+ guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&sst_drv_ctx->ipc_spin_lock);
imr.full = sst_shim_read64(sst_drv_ctx->shim, SST_IMRX);
isr.full = sst_shim_read64(sst_drv_ctx->shim, SST_ISRX);
@@ -200,7 +198,6 @@ void intel_sst_clear_intr_mrfld(struct intel_sst_drv *sst_drv_ctx)
/* un mask busy interrupt */
imr.part.busy_interrupt = 0;
sst_shim_write64(sst_drv_ctx->shim, SST_IMRX, imr.full);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sst_drv_ctx->ipc_spin_lock, irq_flags);
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 11:58 [PATCH 00/20] ASoC: Intel: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 01/20] ASoC: Intel: catpt: ipc: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 18:44 ` Cezary Rojewski
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 02/20] ASoC: Intel: catpt: dsp: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 18:39 ` Cezary Rojewski
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 03/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: utils: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 04/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: probes: Use guard() for spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 19:34 ` Cezary Rojewski
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 05/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: pcm: Use guard() for mutex & " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 06/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: path: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 07/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: loader: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 08/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: ipc: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 09/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: icl: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 10/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: debugfs: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 11/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: debug: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 12/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: core: Use guard() for mutex & " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 13/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: control: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 14/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: apl: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 15/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst_stream: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 16/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst_pvt: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 17/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 18/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst-atom-controls: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:59 ` [PATCH 19/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst-mfld-platform-pcm: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:59 ` phucduc.bui [this message]
2026-06-11 19:04 ` [PATCH 00/20] ASoC: Intel: " Cezary Rojewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260611115901.80438-21-phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--to=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox