From: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Cc: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev>,
linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: ipc: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:58:49 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611115901.80438-9-phucduc.bui@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611115901.80438-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
From: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Clean up the code using guard() for mutex & spin locks.
Additionally, simplify avs_ipc_wait_busy_completion()
while converting the locking code.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
---
sound/soc/intel/avs/ipc.c | 105 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/avs/ipc.c b/sound/soc/intel/avs/ipc.c
index c0feb9edd7f6..0dae36c83678 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/avs/ipc.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/avs/ipc.c
@@ -99,39 +99,39 @@ static void avs_dsp_recovery(struct avs_dev *adev)
unsigned int core_mask;
int ret;
- mutex_lock(&adev->comp_list_mutex);
- /* disconnect all running streams */
- list_for_each_entry(acomp, &adev->comp_list, node) {
- struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd;
- struct snd_soc_card *card;
-
- card = acomp->base.card;
- if (!card)
- continue;
-
- for_each_card_rtds(card, rtd) {
- struct snd_pcm *pcm;
- int dir;
-
- pcm = rtd->pcm;
- if (!pcm || rtd->dai_link->no_pcm)
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &adev->comp_list_mutex) {
+ /* disconnect all running streams */
+ list_for_each_entry(acomp, &adev->comp_list, node) {
+ struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd;
+ struct snd_soc_card *card;
+
+ card = acomp->base.card;
+ if (!card)
continue;
- for_each_pcm_streams(dir) {
- struct snd_pcm_substream *substream;
+ for_each_card_rtds(card, rtd) {
+ struct snd_pcm *pcm;
+ int dir;
- substream = pcm->streams[dir].substream;
- if (!substream || !substream->runtime)
+ pcm = rtd->pcm;
+ if (!pcm || rtd->dai_link->no_pcm)
continue;
- /* No need for _irq() as we are in nonatomic context. */
- snd_pcm_stream_lock(substream);
- snd_pcm_stop(substream, SNDRV_PCM_STATE_DISCONNECTED);
- snd_pcm_stream_unlock(substream);
+ for_each_pcm_streams(dir) {
+ struct snd_pcm_substream *substream;
+
+ substream = pcm->streams[dir].substream;
+ if (!substream || !substream->runtime)
+ continue;
+
+ /* No need for _irq() as we are in nonatomic context. */
+ snd_pcm_stream_lock(substream);
+ snd_pcm_stop(substream, SNDRV_PCM_STATE_DISCONNECTED);
+ snd_pcm_stream_unlock(substream);
+ }
}
}
}
- mutex_unlock(&adev->comp_list_mutex);
/* forcibly shutdown all cores */
core_mask = GENMASK(adev->hw_cfg.dsp_cores - 1, 0);
@@ -294,10 +294,10 @@ void avs_dsp_process_response(struct avs_dev *adev, u64 header)
*/
if (avs_msg_is_reply(header)) {
/* Response processing is invoked from IRQ thread. */
- spin_lock_irq(&ipc->rx_lock);
- avs_dsp_receive_rx(adev, header);
- ipc->rx_completed = true;
- spin_unlock_irq(&ipc->rx_lock);
+ scoped_guard(spinlock_irq, &ipc->rx_lock) {
+ avs_dsp_receive_rx(adev, header);
+ ipc->rx_completed = true;
+ }
} else {
avs_dsp_process_notification(adev, header);
}
@@ -338,21 +338,18 @@ static int avs_ipc_wait_busy_completion(struct avs_ipc *ipc, int timeout)
}
/* Ongoing notification's bottom-half may cause early wakeup */
- spin_lock(&ipc->rx_lock);
- if (!ipc->rx_completed) {
- if (repeats_left) {
+ scoped_guard(spinlock, &ipc->rx_lock) {
+ if (!ipc->rx_completed) {
+ if (!repeats_left)
+ return -ETIMEDOUT;
+
/* Reply delayed due to notification. */
repeats_left--;
reinit_completion(&ipc->busy_completion);
- spin_unlock(&ipc->rx_lock);
goto again;
}
-
- spin_unlock(&ipc->rx_lock);
- return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
- spin_unlock(&ipc->rx_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -397,12 +394,12 @@ static int avs_dsp_do_send_msg(struct avs_dev *adev, struct avs_ipc_msg *request
if (!ipc->ready)
return -EPERM;
- mutex_lock(&ipc->msg_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&ipc->msg_mutex);
- spin_lock(&ipc->rx_lock);
- avs_ipc_msg_init(ipc, reply);
- avs_dsp_send_tx(adev, request, true);
- spin_unlock(&ipc->rx_lock);
+ scoped_guard(spinlock, &ipc->rx_lock) {
+ avs_ipc_msg_init(ipc, reply);
+ avs_dsp_send_tx(adev, request, true);
+ }
ret = avs_ipc_wait_busy_completion(ipc, timeout);
if (ret) {
@@ -412,7 +409,7 @@ static int avs_dsp_do_send_msg(struct avs_dev *adev, struct avs_ipc_msg *request
/* Same treatment as on exception, just stack_dump=0. */
avs_dsp_exception_caught(adev, &msg);
}
- goto exit;
+ return ret;
}
ret = ipc->rx.rsp.status;
@@ -436,8 +433,6 @@ static int avs_dsp_do_send_msg(struct avs_dev *adev, struct avs_ipc_msg *request
memcpy(reply->data, ipc->rx.data, reply->size);
}
-exit:
- mutex_unlock(&ipc->msg_mutex);
return ret;
}
@@ -501,16 +496,16 @@ static int avs_dsp_do_send_rom_msg(struct avs_dev *adev, struct avs_ipc_msg *req
struct avs_ipc *ipc = adev->ipc;
int ret;
- mutex_lock(&ipc->msg_mutex);
+ guard(mutex)(&ipc->msg_mutex);
- spin_lock(&ipc->rx_lock);
- avs_ipc_msg_init(ipc, NULL);
- /*
- * with hw still stalled, memory windows may not be
- * configured properly so avoid accessing SRAM
- */
- avs_dsp_send_tx(adev, request, false);
- spin_unlock(&ipc->rx_lock);
+ scoped_guard(spinlock, &ipc->rx_lock) {
+ avs_ipc_msg_init(ipc, NULL);
+ /*
+ * with hw still stalled, memory windows may not be
+ * configured properly so avoid accessing SRAM
+ */
+ avs_dsp_send_tx(adev, request, false);
+ }
/* ROM messages must be sent before main core is unstalled */
ret = avs_dsp_op(adev, stall, AVS_MAIN_CORE_MASK, false);
@@ -522,8 +517,6 @@ static int avs_dsp_do_send_rom_msg(struct avs_dev *adev, struct avs_ipc_msg *req
dev_err(adev->dev, "%s (0x%08x 0x%08x) failed: %d\n",
name, request->glb.primary, request->glb.ext.val, ret);
- mutex_unlock(&ipc->msg_mutex);
-
return ret;
}
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 11:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 11:58 [PATCH 00/20] ASoC: Intel: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 01/20] ASoC: Intel: catpt: ipc: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 18:44 ` Cezary Rojewski
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 02/20] ASoC: Intel: catpt: dsp: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 18:39 ` Cezary Rojewski
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 03/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: utils: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 04/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: probes: Use guard() for spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 19:34 ` Cezary Rojewski
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 05/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: pcm: Use guard() for mutex & " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 06/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: path: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 07/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: loader: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` phucduc.bui [this message]
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 09/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: icl: Use guard() for spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 10/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: debugfs: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 11/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: debug: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 12/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: core: Use guard() for mutex & " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 13/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: control: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 14/20] ASoC: Intel: avs: apl: " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 15/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst_stream: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 16/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst_pvt: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 17/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:58 ` [PATCH 18/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst-atom-controls: Use guard() for mutex locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:59 ` [PATCH 19/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst-mfld-platform-pcm: Use guard() for mutex & spin locks phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 11:59 ` [PATCH 20/20] ASoC: Intel: atom: sst_ipc: Use guard() for " phucduc.bui
2026-06-11 19:04 ` [PATCH 00/20] ASoC: Intel: Use guard() for mutex & " Cezary Rojewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260611115901.80438-9-phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--to=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox