Re: [PATCH] rename s1810c* to presonus_studio to get s1824c working

[Amin Dandache <amin@s7u.net>]

Hi,


Yes, the previous file was named after the exact model 1810c.
I would not like to put the 1824c into the file as it suggest its just 
one model.
It feels like monkey patching for me.

Also it's the same series: Presonus Studio.

And yes it's just a new device ID, but there are some features missing 
like SPDIF which i could not test yet, also if every function is adopted 
by the 1810c.

I just tested the basic functionality and it works perfect for analog 
signals.

In the future there could be some differences in the handling for the 
models, so i tried to prepare that and rename it to a global name that 
supports more devices inside and more cases for the devices.
like the mixer_scarlett.c which supports all focusrite scarlett devices 
in one file.

I will refactor the proper subject and try put the signed-off-by tag, as 
this is my first commit i have to learn a little bit new.


Best Regards,
Amin

On 27.02.25 10:29, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 07:43:08 +0100,
> Amin Dandache wrote:
>> ---
>>   sound/usb/Makefile                            |   2 +-
>>   sound/usb/format.c                            |  12 +-
>>   ...mixer_s1810c.c => mixer_presonus_studio.c} | 247 +++++++++---------
>>   sound/usb/mixer_presonus_studio.h             |   8 +
>>   sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c                      |  12 +-
>>   sound/usb/mixer_s1810c.h                      |   7 -
>>   sound/usb/quirks.c                            |   9 +-
>>   7 files changed, 161 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
>>   rename sound/usb/{mixer_s1810c.c => mixer_presonus_studio.c} (59%)
>>   create mode 100644 sound/usb/mixer_presonus_studio.h
>>   delete mode 100644 sound/usb/mixer_s1810c.h
> First off, could you give the reason why you must rename the whole
> stuff?  Is it just to add the support of a new device ID 194f:010d?
> If so, we don't have to rename everything, but just keep using the
> same function as is.  You can put simply a comment that the function
> supports both devices, instead.
>
> And, the patch should be formatted properly. You need a proper subject
> prefix (e.g. "ALSA: usb-audio: ....."), then put more detailed patch
> description texts.
>
> Last but not least, most importantly, we need your Signed-off-by tag.
> It's a legal requirement.
>
> Could you address the above and resubmit?
>
>
> thanks,
>
> Takashi