Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches working GREAT (<2.9ms audio latency),see testresults ,but ISDN trouble

Re: [rtl] Low-latency patches working GREAT (<2.9ms audio latency),see testresults ,but ISDN trouble

[Yves R. Crevecoeur]

Uh, Oh! Look out!

I can see them already, the headlines, the books and movie titles.  
They read:

" Barbarians from the Linux Camps! "

Well, to anybody who thinks they can compete with the BeOS in the 
multimedia
 and internet appliance world I say:  " Welcome!  Seriously! "

To add to Mr. Torwalds advice below, I suggest that you not only wake 
up, but
also smell the coffee and stop drinking the coolaid  : )

ciao
yc


>
>
>On Sat, 28 Aug 1999 yodaiken@fsmlabs.com wrote:
>> 
>> A 25% disk i/o decrease is very serious. Lets get some serious 
feedback
>> from people running internet and database servers before we blow off
>> the server users in order to compete with BEOS.
>
>Guys, if anybody thinks we're competing with BeOS, then wake up. BeOS 
is a
>niche OS that isn't worth competing against, and at most we can try to
>find out what it's good at and see if we can emulate some of it. But 
25%
>disk IO decrease is definitely not something we want to even consider.
>
>		Linus
>
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-
kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu
>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
> 
>To unsubscribe send a blank email to leave-bedevtalk-
6784P@listbeast.be.com
>
>