Linux Sound subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vijendar Mukunda" <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/25] soundwire: amd: return response on IMM status cleanup timeout
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2026 16:04:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-203016@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261107154659.3358223-11-Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
issue to consider:
- [High] soundwire: amd: unpolled IMM_RES_VALID clear in
  amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp()
--

commit 89df36f0150dc3c96912a2aa097eb2d1d5dc0e6d
Author: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>

soundwire: amd: return response on IMM status cleanup timeout

This commit changes amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp() to log a warning, write
*response, and return 0 when polling for AMD_SDW_IMM_RES_VALID to clear
times out after reading the response registers.

> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c b/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> index f2ed0490aa82d..579b12946c0ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> @@ -384,9 +384,12 @@ static int amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp(struct amd_sdw_manager *amd_manager, u32 lo
>  	ret = readl_poll_timeout(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS, sts,
>  				 !(sts & AMD_SDW_IMM_RES_VALID), ACP_DELAY_US, AMD_SDW_TIMEOUT);
>  	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(amd_manager->dev, "SDW%x cmd status retry failed\n",
> -			amd_manager->instance);
> -		return ret;
> +		/* Response already latched above; timeout here is non-fatal.
> +		 * The residual IMM_RES_VALID bit will be cleared by the bad-state
> +		 * guard on the next invocation, provided IMM_CMD_BUSY is not also stuck.
> +		 */
> +		dev_warn(amd_manager->dev, "SDW%x cmd status retry failed\n",
> +			 amd_manager->instance);
>  	}
>  	*response = ((u64)upper_resp << 32) | lower_resp;
>  	return 0;

[Severity: High]
Can returning 0 when AMD_SDW_IMM_RES_VALID fails to clear cause the next
command to read stale response registers from ACP_SW_IMM_RESP_UPPER_WORD
and ACP_SW_IMM_RESP_LOWER_QWORD?

When a caller such as amd_sdw_xfer_msg() issues back-to-back commands, the
next call to amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp() hits the bad-state guard, which
writes AMD_SDW_IMM_RES_VALID without polling for it to clear before
issuing the new command and polling for (sts & AMD_SDW_IMM_RES_VALID):

drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c:amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp() {
    ...
	if (sts & AMD_SDW_IMM_RES_VALID) {
		dev_err(amd_manager->dev, "SDW%x manager is in bad state\n", amd_manager->instance);
		writel(AMD_SDW_IMM_RES_VALID, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS);
	}
	writel(upper_data, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_UPPER_WORD);
	writel(lower_data, amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_LOWER_QWORD);

	ret = readl_poll_timeout(amd_manager->mmio + ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS, sts,
				 (sts & AMD_SDW_IMM_RES_VALID), ACP_DELAY_US, AMD_SDW_TIMEOUT);
    ...
}

Because readl_poll_timeout() reads ACP_SW_IMM_CMD_STS immediately before
sleeping and the clear handshake is asynchronous, the residual
AMD_SDW_IMM_RES_VALID bit can still be set on the first read, causing
amd_sdw_send_cmd_get_resp() to return the previous command's response
before the new SoundWire frame finishes on the bus.  Follow-up commit
"soundwire: amd: clarify bad-state guard poll omission in IMM_RES_VALID
path" documents the missing poll in the bad-state guard, but does not
prevent the subsequent response poll from matching the un-cleared bit.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261107154659.3358223-1-Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com?part=10

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-07 16:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-07 15:45 [PATCH v5 00/25] soundwire: amd: SoundWire manager driver bug fixes Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 01/25] soundwire: amd: consolidate pad register macros into amd_init.h Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 02/25] soundwire: amd: program pad SCHMEN and OE control for ACP 7.0/7.1/7.2 Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 19:00     ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 03/25] soundwire: amd: add pad ctrl helpers for D0/D3 PM transitions Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 04/25] soundwire: amd: track full pad teardown across suspend/resume Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 05/25] soundwire: amd: fix missing wake interrupt and group wake-arming calls in runtime suspend Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 06/25] soundwire: amd: fix IRQ thread dropping STATUS_0TO7 on simultaneous wake Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 07/25] soundwire: amd: remove STATUS_8TO11 clear from amd_sdw_process_wake_event() Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 08/25] soundwire: amd: fix missing wake interrupt for ACP6.3 in POWER_OFF suspend Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:02   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 09/25] soundwire: amd: fix SDW command timeout return value handling Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 10/25] soundwire: amd: return response on IMM status cleanup timeout Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:04   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 11/25] soundwire: amd: clarify bad-state guard poll omission in IMM_RES_VALID path Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 12/25] soundwire: amd: cache ping slave status to avoid spurious disconnect on timeout Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 13/25] soundwire: amd: assert msg_lock is held in amd_sdw_read_ping_status() Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 14/25] soundwire: amd: fix work drain ordering in remove path Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:14   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 19:07     ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 15/25] soundwire: amd: defer dev_set_drvdata() until after INIT_WORK() Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 16/25] soundwire: amd: pm_runtime guard in remove path Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 17/25] soundwire: amd: use interrupt_enabled flag to guard IRQ work scheduling Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 20:29     ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 18/25] soundwire: amd: delay *sdw_ctx publication until after startup succeeds Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 20:19     ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 19/25] soundwire: amd: propagate amd_init_sdw_manager() error on resume Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 20/25] soundwire: amd: drop amd_deinit_sdw_manager() in POWER_OFF suspend Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 21/25] soundwire: amd: replace >= ACP70 with explicit switch/case in PM paths Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 22/25] soundwire: amd: fix interrupt gate and work drain ordering in PM ops Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:25   ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 20:37     ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 23/25] soundwire: amd: check for NULL manager drvdata in sdw_amd_startup() Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 24/25] soundwire: amd: fix shared-register RMW race in amd_sdw_set_device_state() Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 25/25] soundwire: amd: fix shared-register RMW race in amd_sdw_host_wake_enable() Vijendar Mukunda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-203016@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox