From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vijendar Mukunda" <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 22/25] soundwire: amd: fix interrupt gate and work drain ordering in PM ops
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2026 16:25:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-203057@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261107154659.3358223-23-Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [Medium] soundwire: amd: unserialized hard IRQ race with work drain in
amd_suspend()
- [Low] soundwire: amd: commit message describes prior patch revision in
PM ops
--
commit f3586b88e19b93c1d283c25b97e67e7d9da93bab
Author: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
> soundwire: amd: fix interrupt gate and work drain ordering in PM ops
>
> The CLK_STOP_MODE branches in amd_suspend() and amd_suspend_runtime()
> did not close the ACP_EXTERNAL_INTR_CNTL delivery gate before draining
> amd_sdw_irq_thread and amd_sdw_work. An ISR already running when the
> drains completed could re-queue work after cancel_work_sync() returned,
> racing amd_sdw_clock_stop().
>
> In both CLK_STOP_MODE paths, amd_sdw_wake_enable() was also called
> before amd_enable_sdw_interrupts(). Since amd_enable_sdw_interrupts()
> writes the interrupt mask unconditionally, it clobbered the wake bit
> set by amd_sdw_wake_enable().
>
> For both amd_suspend() and amd_suspend_runtime():
> - CLK_STOP_MODE: add amd_disable_sdw_interrupts() and
> cancel_work_sync(irq_thread) before the work drain; reopen the gate
> with amd_enable_sdw_interrupts() after clock stop, then call
> amd_sdw_wake_enable() so the wake bit is not clobbered.
> - POWER_OFF_MODE: add amd_disable_sdw_interrupts() and
> cancel_work_sync(irq_thread) before the work drain; remove the
> redundant post-clock-stop amd_disable_sdw_interrupts() call.
>
> Fixes: 86a4371b7697 ("soundwire: amd: fix for handling slave alerts after link is down")
> Reported-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
> Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-3b774ace-00cf-41e6-82eb-85cd43f5e1d6
> Signed-off-by: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
[Severity: Low]
Does the commit message describe an intermediate revision of this series
rather than the parent commit?
In the parent commit, amd_suspend_runtime() did not drain
amd_sdw_irq_thread or amd_sdw_work at all (this patch adds both
cancel_work_sync() calls there), and neither CLK_STOP_MODE path called
amd_enable_sdw_interrupts() before this patch.
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c b/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> index 2b38b9bf97f50..4e151f7350c96 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c
> @@ -1437,15 +1437,20 @@ static int __maybe_unused amd_suspend(struct device *dev)
> }
>
> if (amd_manager->power_mode_mask & AMD_SDW_CLK_STOP_MODE) {
> + amd_disable_sdw_interrupts(amd_manager);
> + cancel_work_sync(&amd_manager->amd_sdw_irq_thread);
> cancel_work_sync(&amd_manager->amd_sdw_work);
> - amd_sdw_wake_enable(amd_manager, false);
> ret = amd_sdw_host_wake_enable_by_rev(amd_manager, false);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> ret = amd_sdw_clock_stop(amd_manager);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> + amd_enable_sdw_interrupts(amd_manager);
> + amd_sdw_wake_enable(amd_manager, false);
[Severity: Medium]
Can an in-flight parent ACP hard IRQ handler still queue
amd_sdw_irq_thread after cancel_work_sync() returns in amd_suspend() and
amd_suspend_runtime()?
None of the parent ACP hard IRQ handlers (such as acp63_irq_handler() in
sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c) check amd_manager->interrupt_enabled or acquire
acp_sdw_lock before calling schedule_work(&amd_manager->amd_sdw_irq_thread):
sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c:acp63_irq_handler() {
...
ext_intr_stat = readl(adata->acp63_base + ACP_EXTERNAL_INTR_STAT);
if (ext_intr_stat & ACP_SDW0_STAT) {
writel(ACP_SDW0_STAT, adata->acp63_base + ACP_EXTERNAL_INTR_STAT);
amd_manager = dev_get_drvdata(&adata->sdw->pdev[0]->dev);
if (amd_manager)
schedule_work(&amd_manager->amd_sdw_irq_thread);
...
}
If the hard IRQ fires just before amd_disable_sdw_interrupts() masks
ACP_EXTERNAL_INTR_CNTL, the two contexts can interleave as follows:
CPU0 CPU1 (<hardirq>)
amd_suspend()
acp63_irq_handler()
readl(... + ACP_EXTERNAL_INTR_STAT)
amd_disable_sdw_interrupts()
interrupt_enabled = false
amd_updatel(ACP_EXTERNAL_INTR_CNTL, ...)
cancel_work_sync(&amd_sdw_irq_thread)
cancel_work_sync(&amd_sdw_work)
amd_sdw_clock_stop()
amd_enable_sdw_interrupts()
interrupt_enabled = true
schedule_work(&amd_sdw_irq_thread)
amd_sdw_irq_thread()
schedule_work(&amd_sdw_work)
<-- runs while clock is stopped
Even in AMD_SDW_POWER_OFF_MODE where interrupt_enabled remains false,
amd_sdw_irq_thread() still reads SoundWire MMIO registers and calls
amd_sdw_read_and_process_ping_status() without checking interrupt_enabled,
racing with amd_sdw_clock_stop(), amd_disable_sdw_manager(), and D3 entry.
In AMD_SDW_CLK_STOP_MODE, calling amd_enable_sdw_interrupts() right after
amd_sdw_clock_stop() also sets interrupt_enabled back to true while the
clock is stopped, allowing a late amd_sdw_irq_thread() to schedule
amd_sdw_work and trigger MIPI command timeouts (-ETIMEDOUT).
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261107154659.3358223-1-Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com?part=22
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-07 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-07 15:45 [PATCH v5 00/25] soundwire: amd: SoundWire manager driver bug fixes Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 01/25] soundwire: amd: consolidate pad register macros into amd_init.h Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 02/25] soundwire: amd: program pad SCHMEN and OE control for ACP 7.0/7.1/7.2 Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 19:00 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 03/25] soundwire: amd: add pad ctrl helpers for D0/D3 PM transitions Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 04/25] soundwire: amd: track full pad teardown across suspend/resume Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 05/25] soundwire: amd: fix missing wake interrupt and group wake-arming calls in runtime suspend Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 06/25] soundwire: amd: fix IRQ thread dropping STATUS_0TO7 on simultaneous wake Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 07/25] soundwire: amd: remove STATUS_8TO11 clear from amd_sdw_process_wake_event() Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 08/25] soundwire: amd: fix missing wake interrupt for ACP6.3 in POWER_OFF suspend Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 09/25] soundwire: amd: fix SDW command timeout return value handling Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 10/25] soundwire: amd: return response on IMM status cleanup timeout Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 11/25] soundwire: amd: clarify bad-state guard poll omission in IMM_RES_VALID path Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 12/25] soundwire: amd: cache ping slave status to avoid spurious disconnect on timeout Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 13/25] soundwire: amd: assert msg_lock is held in amd_sdw_read_ping_status() Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 14/25] soundwire: amd: fix work drain ordering in remove path Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 19:07 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 15/25] soundwire: amd: defer dev_set_drvdata() until after INIT_WORK() Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 16/25] soundwire: amd: pm_runtime guard in remove path Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:10 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 17/25] soundwire: amd: use interrupt_enabled flag to guard IRQ work scheduling Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 20:29 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 18/25] soundwire: amd: delay *sdw_ctx publication until after startup succeeds Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-07 20:19 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 19/25] soundwire: amd: propagate amd_init_sdw_manager() error on resume Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 20/25] soundwire: amd: drop amd_deinit_sdw_manager() in POWER_OFF suspend Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 21/25] soundwire: amd: replace >= ACP70 with explicit switch/case in PM paths Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 22/25] soundwire: amd: fix interrupt gate and work drain ordering in PM ops Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 16:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-07 20:37 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 23/25] soundwire: amd: check for NULL manager drvdata in sdw_amd_startup() Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 24/25] soundwire: amd: fix shared-register RMW race in amd_sdw_set_device_state() Vijendar Mukunda
2026-11-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v5 25/25] soundwire: amd: fix shared-register RMW race in amd_sdw_host_wake_enable() Vijendar Mukunda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-203057@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox