Linux SPARSE checker discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/4] sparse/dissect: fix missing usage reports for unnamed members of named types
@ 2026-06-05 14:56 Oleg Nesterov
  2026-06-05 14:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] sparse/dissect: introduce find_report_member() Oleg Nesterov
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Oleg Nesterov @ 2026-06-05 14:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chris Li, Luc Van Oostenryck; +Cc: Alexey Gladkov, linux-sparse

Hello,

With the recent change, dissect.c correctly reports the definitions of the
promoted members, but it still doesn't report the usages of the underlying
members.

The only functional change is 4/4.

Oleg.
---

 dissect.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-05 14:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-05 14:56 [PATCH 0/4] sparse/dissect: fix missing usage reports for unnamed members of named types Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-05 14:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] sparse/dissect: introduce find_report_member() Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-05 14:56 ` [PATCH 2/4] sparse/dissect: fold lookup_member() into find_report_member() Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-05 14:56 ` [PATCH 3/4] sparse/dissect: introduce struct lookup_args for lookup_member() Oleg Nesterov
2026-06-05 14:56 ` [PATCH 4/4] sparse/dissect: fix missing usage reports for unnamed members of named types Oleg Nesterov

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox