From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] spi: dw: use threaded interrupt and optimize the threaded ISR
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 12:40:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260615044039.9750-6-jszhang@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260615044039.9750-1-jszhang@kernel.org>
To avoid blocking for an excessive amount of time, eventually impacting
on system responsiveness, hard interrupt handlers should finish
executing in as little time as possible.
Use threaded interrupt and move the SPI transfer handling to an
interrupt thread.
After that, since the dw_reader() and dw_writer() are called in
threaded ISR now, so we can delay the unmasking interrupts until no
rx and tx action is taken, thus reduce the interrupt numbers further.
Tested with below two cmds
./spidev_test -D /dev/spidev1.3 -s 30000000 -S 327680 -I 1
./spidev_test -D /dev/spidev1.3 -s 30000000 -S 327680 -I 1000
./rtla timerlat top -q -k -P f:95
The first cmd is to check the interrupt numbers optmizaion result, the
2nd cmd group is to check the threaded interrupt improvement.
Before the patch:
each 32KB spi spidev_test transfer triggers 33118 interrupts
spidev_test reports ~22090kbps
and rtla reports:
Timer Latency
0 00:00:37 | IRQ Timer Latency (us) | Thread Timer Latency (us)
CPU COUNT | cur min avg max | cur min avg max
0 #9958 | 1 0 67 103394 | 6 4 2198 105031
1 #36902 | 1 0 1 18 | 5 4 5 29
After the patch:
each 32KB spi spidev_test transfer only triggers 3 interrupts
spidev_test reports ~23520kbps
and now rtla reports:
Timer Latency
0 00:00:58 | IRQ Timer Latency (us) | Thread Timer Latency (us)
CPU COUNT | cur min avg max | cur min avg max
0 #58362 | 1 0 0 29 | 6 3 4 56
1 #58363 | 1 0 1 23 | 6 4 5 68
In summary:
before the patch after the patch
33118 interrutps 3 interrupts reduced by 11038 times!
103394 us max latency 29 us max latency reduced by 3564 times!
22090 kbps 23520 kbps improved by 6.5%
Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
---
drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c
index feac17655847..cc4cc058ee72 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-dw-core.c
@@ -132,10 +132,11 @@ static inline u32 dw_spi_rx_max(struct dw_spi *dws)
return min_t(u32, dws->rx_len, dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_RXFLR));
}
-static void dw_writer(struct dw_spi *dws)
+static u32 dw_writer(struct dw_spi *dws)
{
u32 max = dw_spi_tx_max(dws);
u32 txw = 0;
+ u32 tx = 0;
while (max--) {
if (dws->tx) {
@@ -150,13 +151,16 @@ static void dw_writer(struct dw_spi *dws)
}
dw_write_io_reg(dws, DW_SPI_DR, txw);
--dws->tx_len;
+ ++tx;
}
+ return tx;
}
-static void dw_reader(struct dw_spi *dws)
+static u32 dw_reader(struct dw_spi *dws)
{
u32 max = dw_spi_rx_max(dws);
u32 rxw;
+ u32 rx = 0;
while (max--) {
rxw = dw_read_io_reg(dws, DW_SPI_DR);
@@ -171,7 +175,9 @@ static void dw_reader(struct dw_spi *dws)
dws->rx += dws->n_bytes;
}
--dws->rx_len;
+ ++rx;
}
+ return rx;
}
int dw_spi_check_status(struct dw_spi *dws, bool raw)
@@ -210,42 +216,59 @@ int dw_spi_check_status(struct dw_spi *dws, bool raw)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(dw_spi_check_status, "SPI_DW_CORE");
-static irqreturn_t dw_spi_transfer_handler(struct dw_spi *dws)
+static irqreturn_t dw_spi_irq_thread_fn(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
- u16 irq_status = dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_ISR);
+ struct spi_controller *ctlr = dev_id;
+ struct dw_spi *dws = spi_controller_get_devdata(ctlr);
+ u16 irq_status = dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_RISR);
+ u32 rx, tx, imask, mask = 0;
+
+ do {
+ /*
+ * Read data from the Rx FIFO every time we've got a chance executing
+ * this method. If there is nothing left to receive, terminate the
+ * procedure. Otherwise adjust the Rx FIFO Threshold level if it's a
+ * final stage of the transfer. By doing so we'll get the next IRQ
+ * right when the leftover incoming data is received.
+ */
+ rx = dw_reader(dws);
+ if (!dws->rx_len) {
+ mask = DW_SPI_INT_MASK;
+ spi_finalize_current_transfer(dws->ctlr);
+ } else if (dws->rx_len <= dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_RXFTLR)) {
+ dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_RXFTLR, dws->rx_len - 1);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Send data out if Tx FIFO Empty IRQ is received. The IRQ will be
+ * disabled after the data transmission is finished so not to
+ * have the TXE IRQ flood at the final stage of the transfer.
+ */
+ if (irq_status & DW_SPI_INT_TXEI) {
+ tx = dw_writer(dws);
+ if (!dws->tx_len)
+ mask = DW_SPI_INT_TXEI;
+ }
+ } while (rx != 0 || tx != 0);
+
+ imask = DW_SPI_INT_TXEI | DW_SPI_INT_TXOI |
+ DW_SPI_INT_RXUI | DW_SPI_INT_RXOI | DW_SPI_INT_RXFI;
+ imask &= ~mask;
+ dw_spi_umask_intr(dws, imask);
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t dw_spi_transfer_handler(struct dw_spi *dws)
+{
if (dw_spi_check_status(dws, false)) {
spi_finalize_current_transfer(dws->ctlr);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
- /*
- * Read data from the Rx FIFO every time we've got a chance executing
- * this method. If there is nothing left to receive, terminate the
- * procedure. Otherwise adjust the Rx FIFO Threshold level if it's a
- * final stage of the transfer. By doing so we'll get the next IRQ
- * right when the leftover incoming data is received.
- */
- dw_reader(dws);
- if (!dws->rx_len) {
- dw_spi_mask_intr(dws, DW_SPI_INT_MASK);
- spi_finalize_current_transfer(dws->ctlr);
- } else if (dws->rx_len <= dw_readl(dws, DW_SPI_RXFTLR)) {
- dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_RXFTLR, dws->rx_len - 1);
- }
-
- /*
- * Send data out if Tx FIFO Empty IRQ is received. The IRQ will be
- * disabled after the data transmission is finished so not to
- * have the TXE IRQ flood at the final stage of the transfer.
- */
- if (irq_status & DW_SPI_INT_TXEI) {
- dw_writer(dws);
- if (!dws->tx_len)
- dw_spi_mask_intr(dws, DW_SPI_INT_TXEI);
- }
+ dw_spi_mask_intr(dws, DW_SPI_INT_MASK);
- return IRQ_HANDLED;
+ return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
}
static irqreturn_t dw_spi_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
@@ -944,13 +967,6 @@ int dw_spi_add_controller(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws)
/* Basic HW init */
dw_spi_hw_init(dev, dws);
- ret = request_irq(dws->irq, dw_spi_irq, IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(dev),
- ctlr);
- if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOTCONN) {
- dev_err(dev, "can not request IRQ\n");
- goto err_free_ctlr;
- }
-
dw_spi_init_mem_ops(dws);
ctlr->mode_bits = SPI_CPOL | SPI_CPHA;
@@ -990,7 +1006,7 @@ int dw_spi_add_controller(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws)
if (dws->dma_ops && dws->dma_ops->dma_init) {
ret = dws->dma_ops->dma_init(dev, dws);
if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
- goto err_free_irq;
+ goto err_free_ctlr;
} else if (ret) {
dev_warn(dev, "DMA init failed\n");
} else {
@@ -999,6 +1015,13 @@ int dw_spi_add_controller(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws)
}
}
+ ret = request_threaded_irq(dws->irq, dw_spi_irq, dw_spi_irq_thread_fn,
+ IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(dev), ctlr);
+ if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOTCONN) {
+ dev_err(dev, "can not request IRQ\n");
+ goto err_free_ctlr;
+ }
+
ret = spi_register_controller(ctlr);
if (ret) {
dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "problem registering spi controller\n");
@@ -1012,7 +1035,6 @@ int dw_spi_add_controller(struct device *dev, struct dw_spi *dws)
if (dws->dma_ops && dws->dma_ops->dma_exit)
dws->dma_ops->dma_exit(dws);
dw_spi_enable_chip(dws, 0);
-err_free_irq:
free_irq(dws->irq, ctlr);
err_free_ctlr:
spi_controller_put(ctlr);
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 5:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-15 4:40 [PATCH 0/5] spi: dw: use threaded interrupt Jisheng Zhang
2026-06-15 4:40 ` [PATCH 1/5] spi: dw: fix first spi transfer with dma always fallback to PIO Jisheng Zhang
2026-06-15 4:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] spi: dw: use the correct error msg if request_irq() fails Jisheng Zhang
2026-06-15 4:40 ` [PATCH 3/5] spi: dw: use DW_SPI_ISR directly Jisheng Zhang
2026-06-15 4:40 ` [PATCH 4/5] spi: dw: use DW_SPI_INT_MASK instead of hardcoded 0xff Jisheng Zhang
2026-06-15 4:40 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2026-06-15 5:37 ` [PATCH 5/5] spi: dw: use threaded interrupt and optimize the threaded ISR Christophe JAILLET
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260615044039.9750-6-jszhang@kernel.org \
--to=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox